Analysis

• North Korean Tactics
  James Minnich, Major, US Army, September 2001
   
• North Korea’s Military Strategy
  Homer Hodge, USAWC Parameters, Spring 2003.
   
• Possible DPRK Military Options
  Congressional Research Service, 2003.
   
• Countering DPRK Special Purpose Forces
  Troy Krause, Major, US Army, April 1999.
   
• Estimate of DPRK Military Energy Use
  David Von Hippel & Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute, November 1997.
   

Reference Materials

• Memorandum on Areas In Which US/DPRK Joint Recovery Operations Have Been Conducted
  Ashton Ormes, Research Director of Defense Prisoner of War, Missing Personnel Office
   
• DPRK ‘Military First’ Doctrinal Declaration
  2003
   
• DPRK Provocations 1950-2003
  Congressional Research Service, 2003.
   
• DPRK Military Geography, Balance, and Options
  Congressional Research Service, April 11, 1994 (CRS 94-311S).
   
• North-South Military Capabilities
  Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute, 1994.
   
• North Korea Country Handbook
  Marine Corps Intelligence Activity, Dept. of Defense, May 1997. ( FOIA )
   
• 1995 DPRK Military Handbook ( FOIA )
  Defense Intelligence Agency, 1995 update.
   
• 1976 DPRK Military Handbook ( FOIA )
  Defense Intelligence Agency, 1976.
   
• DPRK Climatological Study ( FOIA )
  US Air Force Environmental Technical Application Center, 1994.
   
• Opposing Force Training Module ( FOIA )
  US Army, 1982.
   
• HARTS (Hardened Artillery Site) in the DPRK
  Capt. James Dennis, 1986.
   
• Competing with Long-Range Artillery
  Daniel Burgess, Field Artillery Magazine, February 1997.
   
• Countering Brains with Brawn
  George Norris, Field Artillery Magazine, April 1990.
   
• ROK Artillery – Present and Future
  John Gordon, Field Artillery Magazine, February 1990.
   
• DMZ Map ( FOIA )
   

Sources

The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Nautilus Institute. Readers should note that Nautilus seeks a diversity of views and opinions on contentious topics in order to identify common ground.