Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

NAPSNet Daily Report 19 July, 2010

  1. I. Napsnet
  2. US on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  3. US-DPRK Relations
  4. US-DPRK MIA Recovery Operations
  5. ROK Energy Security
  6. Japan-India Nuclear Cooperation
Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 19 July, 2010

  1. I. Napsnet
  2. US on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  3. US-DPRK Relations
  4. US-DPRK MIA Recovery Operations
  5. ROK Energy Security
  6. Japan-India Nuclear Cooperation
Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 16 July, 2010

  1. I. NAPSNet
  2. US-DPRK Relations
  3. US Sanctions on the DPRK
  4. DPRK and ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  5. Inter-Korean Relations
  6. Inter-Korean Economic Relations
  7. DPRK Public Health
  8. DPRK Leadership
  9. US-ROK Joint Naval Exercises
  10. PRC on US-ROK Naval Exercise
  11. ROK Military
  12. USFJ Base Relocation
  13. Japan on UNSC Reform
  14. Japanese Nuclear Technology Exports
  15. Japan-India Nuclear Cooperation
  16. Japan Politics
  17. Sino-Japanese Relations
  18. Sino-Russian Relations
  19. Sino-Argentine Nuclear Cooepration
  20. PRC Anti-Piracy Operations
  21. PRC Migrant Labor
  22. PRC Internet Use
Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 16 July, 2010

  1. I. NAPSNet
  2. US-DPRK Relations
  3. US Sanctions on the DPRK
  4. DPRK and ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  5. Inter-Korean Relations
  6. Inter-Korean Economic Relations
  7. DPRK Public Health
  8. DPRK Leadership
  9. US-ROK Joint Naval Exercises
  10. PRC on US-ROK Naval Exercise
  11. ROK Military
  12. USFJ Base Relocation
  13. Japan on UNSC Reform
  14. Japanese Nuclear Technology Exports
  15. Japan-India Nuclear Cooperation
  16. Japan Politics
  17. Sino-Japanese Relations
  18. Sino-Russian Relations
  19. Sino-Argentine Nuclear Cooepration
  20. PRC Anti-Piracy Operations
  21. PRC Migrant Labor
  22. PRC Internet Use
Go to the article

Policy Forum 10-039: Rush to Judgment: Inconsistencies in South Korea’s Cheonan Report

Seunghun Lee, Professor of Physics at the University of Virginia, and J.J. Suh, Director of Korea Studies at Johns Hopkins University, write, “An investigation that is as thorough, objective, and scientific as humanly possible is needed to get to the bottom of the Cheonan incident to discover the cause and perpetrator. After all, forty six lives have been lost, and peace and security of Korea and Northeast Asia is at stake. The dead sailors deserve such a report. So does the international community.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 15 July, 2010

  1. I. NAPSNet
  2. UNC-DPRK Talks
  3. Russia on Six Party Talks
  4. DPRK Internal Situation
  5. Sino-DPRK Economic Relations
  6. Inter-Korea Relations
  7. ROK-US Joint Naval Exercises
  8. ROK-US Military Relations
  9. ROK Military
  10. ROK-Japan Relations
  11. ROK-Japan Defense Cooperation
  12. Japan-Indonesia Defense Cooperation
  13. Japan-US Security Relations
  14. Sino-Singapore Military Cooperation
  15. Sino-Qatar Military Cooperation
  16. PRC Human Rights
  17. PRC Ethnic Unrest
  18. PRC Internet
  19. Cross-Strait Relations
Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 15 July, 2010

  1. I. NAPSNet
  2. UNC-DPRK Talks
  3. Russia on Six Party Talks
  4. DPRK Internal Situation
  5. Sino-DPRK Economic Relations
  6. Inter-Korea Relations
  7. ROK-US Joint Naval Exercises
  8. ROK-US Military Relations
  9. ROK Military
  10. ROK-Japan Relations
  11. ROK-Japan Defense Cooperation
  12. Japan-Indonesia Defense Cooperation
  13. Japan-US Security Relations
  14. Sino-Singapore Military Cooperation
  15. Sino-Qatar Military Cooperation
  16. PRC Human Rights
  17. PRC Ethnic Unrest
  18. PRC Internet
  19. Cross-Strait Relations
Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 14 July, 2010

  1. I. NAPSNet
  2. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Talks
  3. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks
  4. US, ROK on DPRK Nuclear Talks
  5. DPRK-UNC Meeting
  6. Russo-DPRK Relations
  7. Japan Sanctions on the DPRK
  8. Inter-Korean Relations
  9. Inter-Korean Economic Relations
  10. DPRK Leadership
  11. US-ROK Joint Naval Exercises
  12. ROK Military
  13. US-ROK Security Relations
  14. ROK Nuclear Energy
  15. USFJ Base Relocation
  16. Japan Politics
  17. Sino-Japanese Relations
  18. Sino-Indian Relations
  19. PRC Energy Security
  20. PRC Civil Society
  21. PRC Environment
Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 14 July, 2010

  1. I. NAPSNet
  2. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Talks
  3. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks
  4. US, ROK on DPRK Nuclear Talks
  5. DPRK-UNC Meeting
  6. Russo-DPRK Relations
  7. Japan Sanctions on the DPRK
  8. Inter-Korean Relations
  9. Inter-Korean Economic Relations
  10. DPRK Leadership
  11. US-ROK Joint Naval Exercises
  12. ROK Military
  13. US-ROK Security Relations
  14. ROK Nuclear Energy
  15. USFJ Base Relocation
  16. Japan Politics
  17. Sino-Japanese Relations
  18. Sino-Indian Relations
  19. PRC Energy Security
  20. PRC Civil Society
  21. PRC Environment
Go to the article

Policy Forum 10-038: North Korea’s Choice: Bombs over Electricity

Siegfried S. Hecker is professor (research), Department of Management Science and Engineering, co-director of the Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC), Stanford University, and an NAE member. Sean C. Lee is a research assistant, and Chaim Braun is a consulting professor at CISAC. They write, “the next Six-Party negotiations must balance the disincentives the parties can bring to bear on North Korea if it chooses to keep the bomb—namely further international sanctions and isolation—with incentives for greater security and economic development… Instead of remaining fixated on denuclearization, Washington should realize that, in spite of its inconsistent and often contradictory policies during the past 20 years, diplomacy has left Pyongyang with only a handful of bombs, instead of the 100 or more it might have had by now, and essentially no significant nuclear-generated electricity.”

Go to the article