Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

Improving Regional Security and Denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula

Improving Regional Security and Denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula: U.S. Policy Interests and Options Joel Wit, an Adjunct Senior Visiting Scholar at Columbia University’s Weatherhead Institute for East Asia and a Visiting Fellow at the U.S.-Korea Institute at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies, has written a report outlining actions to be taken […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 30 October, 2009

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 29 October, 2009

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 28 October, 2009

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 27 October, 2009

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 26 October, 2009

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 23 October, 2009

Go to the article

North Korea Inside Out: The Case for Economic Engagement

An Independent Task Force, convened by the Asia Society’s Center on U.S.-China Relations and the University of California’s Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, write, “Economic engagement should be a central part of U.S. strategy in dealing with Pyongyang, and is complementary to the current focus on solving the nuclear issue. Sanctions have a role in defending the U.S. against risks of proliferation, but they have not and cannot provide a long-run solution to the North Korean problem. Combining targeted sanctions with robust engagement, as the Obama administration is attempting to do with Iran and Burma, offers the best hope of changing the motivations and the actions of states that presently take a hostile stance toward the U.S. and the international community.”

Read a discussion of this article here.

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 22 October, 2009

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 21 October, 2009

Go to the article