Daily Report Archives
Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.
The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region. It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.
However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.
NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, October 16, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, October 16, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. Question About Success of DPRK Nuclear Test 2. US on DPRK Sanctions 3. Experts on US DPRK Policy Shift 4. PRC and DPRK Sanctions 5. PRC-DPRK Border 6. EU on DPRK Sanctions 7. Japan Naval Redeployment 8. Japan […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, October 12, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, October 12, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. DPRK Sanctions Debate 2. Experts on DPRK Reasoning for Test 3. Question About Success of Nuclear Test 4. Debate on Inter-Korean Projects 5. UN on DPRK Sanctions and Aid 6. ASEAN on DPRK Nuclear Test 7. UNSG Appointment […]
Go to the article
Alexandre Y. Mansourov, Associate Professor at the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in Honolulu, writes, “The day after the nuclear test, we are all somewhat less secure, worse off, and closer to the second Korean War. This notwithstanding, the international community can attempt to turn this crisis into a unique opportunity to resolve the Korean question writ large once and for all through a multinational peace-making effort aimed at extending the benefits of secure and prosperous life in a free and open society to all Koreans living on a united peninsula, while establishing the foundations for a genuine regional multilateral security architecture capable of coping with the most difficult security challenges in Northeast Asia in a cooperative, effective, and mutually acceptable manner.”
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, October 11, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, October 11, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. DPRK on Sanctions, Nuclear Test 2. Question About Success of Nuclear Test 3. Sanctions Against the DPRK 4. Varied Reactions to DPRK Sanctions 5. Inter-Korean Relations 6. Inter-Korean Economic Projects 7. Humanitarian Aid for the DPRK 8. ROK […]
Go to the article
Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute Executive Director, and Tim Savage, Nautilus Institute Senior Associate, write, “The United States and China should also avoid falling into the “blame game” about who failed to prevent North Korea from testing. The Six Party Talks are now dead. As the two great powers involved directly with the North, they have to work together to develop a viable strategy to engage North Korea and restart negotiations, possibly in a new tripartite forum. If the United States baulks at engaging North Korea, then China and Russia will simply cut their own deals with Kim Jong Il in order to re-stabilize the situation.”
Go to the article
Dr. Strangelove in Pyongyang Dr. Strangelove in Pyongyang Policy Forum Online 06-85A: October 10th, 2006 Dr. Strangelove in Pyongyang Essay by Peter Hayes and Tim Savage CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Essay by Peter Hayes and Tim Savage III. Nautilus invites your responses I. Introduction Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute Executive Director, and Tim Savage, Nautilus Institute […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, October 10, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, October 10, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. Speculation About Success of DPRK Nuclear Test 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Test 3. Conflicting Responses to DPRK Nuclear Test 4. Military Response to DPRK Nuclear Test 5. PRC Analyst on DPRK Nuclear Test 6. Fallout of DPRK […]
Go to the article
The Korean Central News Agency issued this announcement claiming to have successfully tested a nuclear bomb on October 9th, 2006. The announcement coincided with an underground explosion in a mine in North Hamgyeong Province. The announcement notes, “the nuclear test was conducted with indigenous wisdom and technology 100%. It marks a historic event as it greatly encouraged and pleased the KPA (Korean People’s Army) and people that have wished to have powerful self-reliant defence capability.”
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, October 09, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, October 09, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. DPRK Nuclear Test 2. DPRK Rally 3. UN on DPRK Nuclear Test 4. Richardson on DPRK Nuclear Test 5. Russia on DPRK Nuclear Test 6. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Test 7. Japan on DPRK Nuclear Test 8. Musical […]
Go to the article
Mark J. Valencia, maritime policy analyst and Nautilus Institute Senior Fellow, writes, “The joint survey could relieve tension and even be a step towards joint development of resources such as fish, gas and minerals thought to be situated in the disputed area. North Korea should not be excluded from such a cooperative effort and any eventual joint development arrangement. Indeed, rather than ignore North Korea’s claims and concerns and thereby further isolate and antagonize it, the two should invite it to join the survey.”
Go to the article