Daily Report Archives
Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.
The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region. It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.
However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, January 10, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1. Kim Jong-il’s Visit to PRC 2. PRC on Six Party Talks 3. US on DPRK Counterfeiting 4. Expert on DPRK-US Relations 5. France on DPRK Nuclear Program 6. ROK Maestro to Perform with DPRK 7. Joint US-Japanese War Games 8. […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, January 09, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, January 09, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. DPRK on Six Party Talks 2. US on Six Party Talks 3. PRC on Six Party Talks 4. DPRK on Counterfeiting 5. PRC, Japan on DPRK Counterfeiting 6. KEDO Project 7. DPRK-Japanese Relations 8. Foreigners-Only Church in DPRK […]
Go to the article
Andrei Lankov, a lecturer in the faculty of Asian Studies, China and Korea Center, at Australian National University who is currently on leave, teaching at Kookmin University, Seoul, writes “active intervention in North Korea will undermine the remarkable goodwill toward China, which can be seen among many neighbors as the rising giant. So, it is more likely that the Chinese will avoid political adventurism and limit themselves to gaining economic advantages in the northern part of the Korean peninsula.”
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, January 05, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, January 05, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. PRC on Six Party Talks 2. Inter-Korean Relations 3. Inter-Koean Trade 4. ROK Aid to DPRK 5. DPRK-US Relations 6. DPRK Defectors Achieve Refugee Status 7. Japan on UNSC Reform 8. Japan on Yasukuni Shrine Issue 9. PRC […]
Go to the article
Col. Jiyul Kim, Director of Asian Studies at the US Army War College, writes “South Korean politics is in a profound period of transition as the result of a generational shift, the end of the Cold War, democratization, and growing self-confidence. Among the emerging political forces, those that are creating the most important political fault lines are the ideologies of pan-Korean nationalism and anti-Great Power-ism. These trends could well mark the end of the U.S. — South Korean alliance as we know it.”
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, January 04, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, January 04, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. US on DPRK Counterfeiting 2. US on Six Party Talks 3. US on DPRK Sanctions 4. DPRK-US Relations 5. US Envoy to DPRK 6. ROK Aid to DPRK 7. ROK Submarine Fleet 8. US on ROK-Japanese Territorial Dispute […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, January 03, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, January 03, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. DPRK on Six Party Talks 2. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Program 3. Expert on DPRK Nuclear Program 4. Think Tank on Inter-Korean Relations 5. ROK Unification Minister 6. ROK Coal Aid to DPRK 7. DPRK on USFK 8. […]
Go to the article
Ruediger Frank, Professor of East Asian Political Economy at the University of Vienna, writes, “If pressure exerted through economic, political, or military means increases to a level that is high enough to trigger a qualitative change such as regime collapse, we might end up with a successful surgery, but a dead patient. Both sanctions and assistance naturally involve a great deal of uncertainty and risk. But while we can still change the engagement therapy after the failure of one type of medicine, the failure of a hard-line approach will leave us with irreversible damage.”
Go to the article
Ruediger Frank, Professor of East Asian Political Economy at the University of Vienna, writes, “There is nothing mystical about North Korea; it is just a highly intransparent case of ordinary development – as easy or as hard to understand as any other example. It can be expected that the closer the institutional structure in North Korea comes to the international mainstream, the easier it will get to integrate this case into standard theoretical models and to compare it with other examples.”
Go to the article