Nautilus Institute’s Policy Forum‘s focus is on the timely publication of expert analysis and op-ed style pieces on the foremost of security-related issues to Northeast Asia. Its mission is to facilitate a multilateral flow of information among an international network of policy-makers, analysts, scholars, media, and readers. Policy Forum essays are typically from a wide range of expertise, political orientations, as well as geographic regions and seeks to present readers with opinions and analysis by experts on the issues as well as alternative voices not typically presented or heard. Feedback, comments, responses from Policy Forum readers are highly encouraged.
Policy Forum 04-18A: North Korea: Guns or Butter?
By analyzing recently reported economic data and citing public statements by Minister Pak Pong-ju, Aidan Foster-Carter of Leeds University argues that at the macroeconomic level, Kim Jong-il cannot put off forever his choice between a military-first policy or a viable North Korean economy. Kim’s Songun (military-first) policy is a direct and indirect barrier to economic recovery and Prime Minister Pak cannot deliver economic progress while shackled by Songun.
Go to the articlePolicy Forum 04-17A: EU-North Korean Relations: No Effort Without Reason
March 30, 2004
By Ruediger Frank
Drug Trafficking and North Korea: Issues for U.S. Policy 3.26.04
PFO 04-16A: March 26, 2004 Drug Trafficking and North Korea: Issues for U.S. Policy By Raphael F. Perl
Go to the articlePolicy Forum 04-16A: Drug Trafficking and North Korea: Issues for U.S. Policy
March 26, 2004
By Raphael F. Perl
Curtailing North Korea’s Illicit Activities By Balbina Hwang
PFO 04-14A: March 24, 2004 Curtailing North Korea’s Illicit Activities By Balbina Hwang
Go to the articlePolicy Forum 04-32A: The Geopolitics of Energy in Northeast Asia
The following is a paper presented by Kent Calder, Director of the Reischauer Center for East Asian Studies at Johns Hopkins University, at the joint Korean Energy Economics Institute (KEEI) and International Energy Agency (IEA) workshop “Northeast Asia Energy Security and Regional Cooperation” in Seoul, Korea from May 17-18, 2004. In this paper Professor Calder argues that energy security is closely tied to political stability in Northeast Asia and that the DPRK is the center of this congruence. He discusses the importance of the Korean Economic Development Organization. (KEDO) and the need for a new or reissued group that includes representatives from the entire region and centers on natural gas and electricity interconnection projects.
Go to the articleNorth Korea’s Legacy of Missed Opportunities
North Korea’s Legacy of Missed Opportunities Mitchell B. Reiss, Director of Policy Planning Remarks to the Heritage Foundation Washington, DC March 12, 2004 Thank you, Peter. It is a pleasure to be here again at Heritage – a place whose prominent voice has played an important role in shaping our national debate about East Asia […]
Go to the articlePolicy Forum 04-09A: The Reality Behind South Korea-US Alliance March 12, 2004 By Koo Kab-woo
This essay is by Professor Koo Kab-woo from Kyungnam University. Koo argues that the intervention for dismantling the unbalanced South Korea-US alliance is essential and could be done through the solidarity of the South Korean civil society with the civil society in other East Asian countries. East Asia must be re-discovered as a new space for action. Changing the historical structure of global politics in East Asia can only be possible with the intervention of the civil society
Go to the articleTHE SIX-PARTY TALKS: KEEPING DIPLOMACY ALIVE By Balbina Y. Hwang, Ph.D.
February 23, 2004 The Six-Party Talks: Keeping Diplomacy Alive By Balbina Y. Hwang, Ph.D. On February 25th, the second round of the much-anticipated Six-Party talks will open in Beijing. These talks are an effort by the United States, China, Japan, Russia, and South Korea to reach a diplomatic solution with North Korea to end its […]
Go to the articlePolicy Forum 04-03A: Don’t Misunderstand Firing of South Korean Foreign Minister February 5, 2004 Brent Choi
In this brief essay, Brent Choi, North Korea specialist for the Joongang Daily, argues that the recent dismissal of South Korean Foreign Affairs and Trade Minister Yoon Young-kwan has been grossly misinterpreted by the U.S. media as an outgrowth of the struggle between pro-U.S. and anti-U.S. factions within the Roh administration. Instead, Yoon’s dismissal must be interpreted through the socio-cultural prism of South Korea’s bureaucratic society.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Nautilus Institute. Readers should note that Nautilus seeks a diversity of views and opinions on contentious topics in order to identify common ground.
Go to the article