Nautilus Institute’s Policy Forum‘s focus is on the timely publication of expert analysis and op-ed style pieces on the foremost of security-related issues to Northeast Asia. Its mission is to facilitate a multilateral flow of information among an international network of policy-makers, analysts, scholars, media, and readers. Policy Forum essays are typically from a wide range of expertise, political orientations, as well as geographic regions and seeks to present readers with opinions and analysis by experts on the issues as well as alternative voices not typically presented or heard. Feedback, comments, responses from Policy Forum readers are highly encouraged.
Policy Forum 06-64A: Gaeseong Industrial Complex in Steady Progress Despite a Series of Negative Incidents
The ROK Ministry of Unification released this statement on the Gaesong project and the current status of Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation. “Most of cash that flows into the complex is the wages and U.S. $ 0.5 million are paid on a monthly basis to cover living expenses for estimated 30,000-40,000 people including 8,000 workers and their family members. Given that number of people, is there something to be left for diversion?”
Go to the articlePolicy Forum 06-63A: Strange Tempests Follow Missile Tests
Kim Tae-kyung, a staff writer at OhmyNews specializing in Northeast Asia regional issues, writes “Thus, this event should be an issue between North Korea and the U.S. Of the many concerned countries, Japan has taken the hardest stance in response to North Korea’s missile launch. Indeed, Japan acts as if it had been attacked by North Korea.”
Go to the articlePolicy Forum 06-62A: What North Korea’s Missile Test Means
Leon V. Sigal, Director of the Northeast Asia Cooperative Security Project at the Social Science Research Council, writes “The hard-liners believe Pyongyang is determined to arm and will never trade away its weapons. Their conviction is not just faith-based: it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Without a serious U.S. effort to negotiate, they are certain to be right.”
Go to the articlePolicy Forum Online 06-61A: July 25th, 2006
Policy Forum Online 06-61A: July 25th, 2006 Policy Forum Online 06-61A: July 25th, 2006 North Korea Focusing On Technological Development To Revive Economy Report by the Institute for Far Eastern Studies CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Report by the Institute for Far Eastern Studies III. Nautilus invites your responses I. Introduction This report, published by the […]
Go to the articlePolicy Forum 06-61A: North Korea Focusing On Technological Development To Revive Economy
This report, published by the Institute for Far Eastern Studies at Kyungnam University, notes, “North Korea has chosen technology as a national priority and refocused its budget through the principle of ‘focus and choice.’ Furthermore, it seems to be pursuing technological development by simultaneously renewing its existing industries and establishing a foundation for high technology.”
Go to the articlePolicy Forum 06-60A: Embrace Tiger, Retreat To Mountain, Test Nuke
Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute Executive Director, writes “The DPRK can now take two paths. It can do nothing for a while, try to obtain the typical late year delivery of food aid from the ROK before winter hits, and hope to muddle through. Or, it can test and hope to adapt its economy in magnificent, nuclear-armed isolation, waiting for the world to adjustto the new strategic reality of North Koreas existence as a nuclear weapons state.”
Go to the articleEmbrace Tiger, Retreat To Mountain, Test Nuke
Embrace Tiger, Retreat To Mountain, Test Nuke Embrace Tiger, Retreat To Mountain, Test Nuke POLICY FORUM ONLINE 06-60A July 21st, 2006 “Embrace Tiger, Retreat To Mountain, Test Nuke” By Peter Hayes CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Essay by Peter Hayes III. Poem to the NDC Chairman: Kim Jong Il published in Pyongyang by the Rodong Sinmun […]
Go to the articlePolicy Forum 06-59A: DPRK Trip Report, July 4 – 8, 2006
Paul Carroll, Program Officer at the Ploughshares Fund, was one of three Americans present in the DPRK during the July 4th missile launches. He contributes this insightful trip report on what he saw there. One particularly interesting remark he notes was a statement by DPRK Vice Minister Kim Gae Gwan who made what seemed to be a reference to the DPRK-PRC relationship, “with respect to our missile launch, I am awaiting responses from other parties. What I hear is Big Brothers saying to Little Brother ‘don’t do that’ but we are not a little boy, we have nuclear weapons.”
Go to the articlePolicy Forum 06-57A: China’s Army Yawns at Pyongyang’s Missiles
John J. Tkacik, Jr., Senior Research Fellow in China Policy in the Asian Studies Center at The Heritage Foundation, writes, “It is now incumbent upon the Bush Administration to face facts– Without Chinese interest in disarming North Korea, much less moderating any of Pyongyang’s other odious behavior, there is no solution to the North Korean problem.”
Go to the articlePolicy Forum 06-58A: DPRK Foreign Ministry Statement Denounces UNSC Resolution Over DPRK Missile Launch
This statement was issued by the DPRK Foreign Ministry on July 16, 2006 in response to UN resolution 1695 condemning in the DPRK’s July 4th missile test. The statements says “First, our Republic strongly denounces and fully condemns the UNSC resolution, a product of the US hostile policy toward the DPRK, and will not be bound to it in the least- Second, our Republic will strengthen its self-defensive war deterrent by all means and methods now that the situation has reached the worst phase due to the extremely hostile act of the United States.”
Go to the article