In today’s Report:
I. United States
II. Republic of Korea
1. DPRK Named Threat to US
United Press International (“IRAN, IRAQ, N.KOREA TOP U.S. THREATS,” Washington, 9/29/97) reported that the US Department of Defense 1997 National Military Strategy assessment named the DPRK, along with Iran and Iraq, as the countries with “both the desire and means to challenge the United States militarily.” The document, the result of a year-long examination of the global strategic environment, warned that “numerous other regional powers” are emerging threats, but did not elaborate.
2. DPRK Nuclear Threat
The Associated Press (“IRAQ MAY STILL BE HIDING NUKES,” Vienna, Austria, 9/29/97) reported that Hans Blix, the outgoing head of the UN International Atomic Energy Agency, told the agency’s 41st annual conference Monday that it has been impossible to verify whether the DPRK has provided a complete inventory on its plutonium supplies. The plutonium inventories are monitored to try to determine whether nuclear material is being diverted from peaceful to military use. Delegates from the ROK, Japan and the European Union expressed concern over the DPRK’s refusal to comply with the agency. Only the US delegation, led by Secretary of Energy Federico Pena, spoke of any cooperation with DPRK. Blix also warned that Iraq may still be hiding nuclear weapons despite years of intensive inspections and monitoring.
3. Effects of DPRK Famine Conditions
Reuters (“U.S. AMBASSADOR CONCERNED ON NORTH KOREA,” Washington, 9/29/97) reported that US ambassador to the UN Bill Richardson said Sunday that massive starvation in the DPRK means its military forces are aggressive, and so the US must remain vigilant. “The situation is serious there. We have to watch it,” Richardson said on NBC television’s “Meet the Press” program. International relief organizations have documented “very, very massive starvation,” he said, adding that the food situation now was “desperate.” “We are concerned about aggressiveness on the part of the North Korean military,” Richardson said in response to questions. “But this is why we have four-party peace talks with us, the Chinese, South Korea, North Korea that would change the strategic outline in the Korean peninsula.” He added that despite the breakdown in the official four-party talks process, discussions continue “at a more junior level with the North Koreans” in New York.
4. ROK Position on Landmines
The Associated Press (“SKOREA TO EXTEND MINE MORATORIUM,” United Nations, 9/29/97) reported that ROK Foreign Minister Yoo Chong-ha, in a speech to the UN General Assembly Monday, announced that the ROK will extend indefinitely its moratorium on exporting anti-personnel mines, but added that the ROK cannot accept the international treaty banning those weapons because of tensions with the DPRK. Yoo said the ROK “has decided to extend for an indefinite period its moratorium on the export of anti-personnel land m
Go to the article