Daily Report Archives
Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.
The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region. It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.
However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, August 09, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, August 09, 2005 I. United States 1. DPRK on Armistice Treaty 2. US on Six Party Talks 3. DPRK on Six Party Talks 4. DPRK on US Arms Buildup Plan 5. ROK Minister to Visit US, PRC 6. Christian Right on DPRK Human Rights […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, August 08, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, August 08, 2005 I. United States 1. Armstice Treaty 2. Six Party Talks 3. US on Six Party Talks 4. Japan on Six Party Talks 5. DPRK Business Relations 6. Aid to DPRK 7. DPRK Sports 8. DPRK Literature 9. Inter-Korean Liberation Day Festivities […]
Go to the article
Leon V. Sigal, director of the Northeast Cooperative Security Project at the Social Science Research Council (SSRC) in New York and editor of The North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Regional Perspectives, wrote: “Far from isolating North Korea, the United States is itself becoming odd man out in the region. If this misguided course had a name, it would be hawk disengagement.”
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, August 04, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, August 04, 2005 I. United States 1. Final Statement of Principles 2. US on Final Statement of Principles 3. DPRK on Final Statement of Principles 4. Progress of Six Party Talks 5. US on Progress at Six Party Talks 6. Japan Privatization 7. UNSC […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, August 03, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, August 03, 2005 I. Unites States 1. Final Statement of Principles 2. Progress of Six Party Talks 3. US on Russian Built Nuclear Power Plant in DPRK 4. Japan on Normalizing Relations with DPRK 5. Mt.Kumgang Tourist Operation 6. ROK-Japanese Territorial Dispute 7. Japan […]
Go to the article
Mitchell B. Reiss, Vice Provost for International Affairs at the College of William & Mary and former Director of Policy Planning at the State Department from July 2003 to February 2005, wrote: “[The] multilateral approach has helped bring North Korea back to Beijing, but Washington must now reassert its leadership and help shape a safer future for Northeast Asia.”
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, August 02, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, August 02, 2005 I. Unites States 1. Final Draft Statement 2. Japan on Final Draft Statement 3. DPRK on US Nuclear Threat 4. US on Progress at Six Party Talks 5. DPRK on Progress at Six Party Talks 6. Mt. Baekdu Tourism Project 7. […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, August 01, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, August 01, 2005 I. Unites States 1. First Joint Statement of Principles at Six Party Talks 2. Second Joint Statement of Principles at Six Party Talks 3. US on Second Draft Statement of Principles 4. ROK Electricity Offer in Second Joint Statement 5. Third […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, July 28, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, July 28, 2005 I. Unites States 1. US-DPRK Relations at Six Party Talks 2. US-DPRK Bilateral Meeting at Six Party Talks 3. ROK-DPRK Bilateral Meeting at Six Party Talks 4. ROK on US Position at Six Party Talks 5. DPRK Uranium Program 6. US […]
Go to the article
Peter Van Ness, visiting fellow at the Contemporary China Centre and lecturer on security in the Department of International Relations at Australian National University as well as author of Confronting the Bush Doctrine: Critical Views from the Asia-Pacific, wrote: “The outcome of the Six Party Talks is likely to transform the strategic relations of Northeast Asia and beyond. If they are successful and North Korea agrees to dismantle its nuclear weapons programs in a verifiable way in return for security and economic assistance, there would be an opportunity to begin to build new security institutions in one of the most volatile regions in the world, thereby providing both strategic stability and economic opportunities for all six participant countries to advance trade and investment projects that would benefit them all.”
Go to the article
