Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, July 11, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, July 11, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, July 11, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. DPRK on Missile Tests, Six Party Talks 2. UN DPRK Sanctions Proposal 3. DPRK-PRC Relations 4. Inter-Korean Ministerial Talks 5. US Law on DPRK Nonproliferation 6. Japanese DPRK Preemptive Strike Threat 7. Inter-Korean Olympic Cooperation 8. DPRK Market […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, July 10, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, July 10, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, July 10, 2006 ——— 1. UN DPRK Sanctions Proposal 2. DPRK-PRC Relations 3. US on DPRK-PRC Communications 4. US-PRC Relations on DPRK 5. DPRK Missile Arsenal 6. Expert on DPRK Missile Tests 7. Criticism of ROK Response to Missile Tests 8. Inter-Korean Relations 9. […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 06-54A: Stop Hyperventilating, Start Talking

Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute Executive Director, writes, North Koreas missile test was a strategic non-issue. Making a big deal out of it simply enabled the United States to delay dealing with the real issue and made it more likely that North Korea will now test its nuclear weapons. Thus, the outcome of North Koreas nuclear challenge once again hangs in the balance.

Go to the article

Policy Forum 06-53A: North Korea’s Missile Tests: Malign Neglect Meets Brinkmanship

Wonhyuk Lim, Nonresident Fellow at the Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution, writes, “If pre-emption is too risky and malign neglect is too ineffective, the only remaining alternative is to establish a credible red line and negotiate seriously with North Korea through bilateral and multilateral talks– Otherwise, North Korea is sure to produce more fissile material and perfect its missile technology, escalating tension every once in a while to draw attention.”

Go to the article

Stop Hyperventilating, Start Talking

Stop Hyperventilating, Start Talking PFO 06-54A: July 7th, 2006 Stop Hyperventilating, Start Talking By Peter Hayes CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Essay by Peter Hayes III. Attachment: DPRK Foreign Ministry Spokesman on Its Missile Launches IV. Nautilus Invites Your Responses   I. Introduction Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute Executive Director, writes, “North Korea’s missile test was a […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, July 06, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, July 06, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, July 06, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. DPRK Missile Test 2. DPRK Intentions on Six Party Talks 3. Analysis of DPRK Missile Launch 4. Criticism of ROK Response to Missile Test 5. Inter-Korean Relations 6. DPRK-PRC Relations 7. US-Japan Missile Defense Cooperation 8. Taiwan Missile […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 07-056: US Missile Defense In Northeast Asia and the Rule of Law in Japan: Evidence from the July 5, 2006 North Korean Missile Test

Umebayashi Hiromichi, Founder and President of Peace Depot, a non-profit organization for peace research and education in Japan, writes, “The use of US bases in Japan directly for the defense of the United States proper is something quite new. Strict rule of law must be followed in relation to the military, and particularly in case of a foreign military using the territory of an independent state it is more necessary than ever in this circumstance to reaffirm the importance of keeping the military strictly within the rule of law.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, July 05, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, July 05, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, July 05, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. DPRK Missile Test 2. Inter-Korean Relations 3. Inter-Korean Cultural Cooperation 4. DPRK Abduction Issue 5. DPRK-PRC Relations 6. DPRK-Russia Energy Deal 7. Japan-US Missile Defense Cooperation 8. ROK-Japan Territorial Dispute 9. PRC-India Trade Relations 10. PRC on Tibet […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 06-52A: North Korean Fireworks?

John Feffer, co-director of Foreign Policy In Focus, writes, “The Bush administration should listen to its Republican allies-Weldon, Murkowski, Lugar-and get serious about negotiating with North Korea. Renew the offer to satisfy Pyongyang’s satellite desires. It might just get Kim Jong Il to listen.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, July 03, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, July 03, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, July 03, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. DPRK Nuclear Threat 2. Six Party Talks 3. G-8 Leaders on DPRK 4. DPRK-Japan Media Relations 5. DPRK Abduction Issue 6. DPRK-Cuba Relations 7. DPRK-US Travel 8. ROK Missile Defense 9. ROK-PRC Relations 10. ROK-Russia Trade Relations 11. […]

Go to the article