Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, July 20, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, July 20, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, July 20, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. US on Six Party Talks 2. DPRK on US Military Aggression 3. Inter-Korean Relations 4. US Financial Sanctions on DPRK 5. US Residency for DPRK Citizens 6. DPRK Defectors 7. DPRK-Macau Bank Ties 8. DPRK-Venezuela Relations 9. DPRK […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, July 19, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, July 19, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, July 19, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. Six Party Relations at ASEAN Forum 2. DPRK Military Mobilization 3. Japanese Sanctions on DPRK 4. US Sanctions on DPRK 5. ROK on US, Japanese Sanctions on DPRK 6. Inter-Korean Family Reunions 7. Inter-Korean Unified Olympic Team 8. […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, July 18, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, July 18, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, July 18, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. Five Party Talks Proposal 2. DPRK Diplomats Gathering 3. ROK on UN DPRK Resolution 4. DPRK-PRC Relations 5. Japanese Sanctions on DPRK 6. DPRK Media on DPRK-US Relations 7. DPRK Missile Arsenal 8. ROK Repatriation, Reparations Legislation 9. […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 06-57A: China’s Army Yawns at Pyongyang’s Missiles

John J. Tkacik, Jr., Senior Research Fellow in China Policy in the Asian Studies Center at The Heritage Foundation, writes, “It is now incumbent upon the Bush Administration to face facts– Without Chinese interest in disarming North Korea, much less moderating any of Pyongyang’s other odious behavior, there is no solution to the North Korean problem.”

Go to the article

Policy Forum 06-58A: DPRK Foreign Ministry Statement Denounces UNSC Resolution Over DPRK Missile Launch

This statement was issued by the DPRK Foreign Ministry on July 16, 2006 in response to UN resolution 1695 condemning in the DPRK’s July 4th missile test. The statements says “First, our Republic strongly denounces and fully condemns the UNSC resolution, a product of the US hostile policy toward the DPRK, and will not be bound to it in the least- Second, our Republic will strengthen its self-defensive war deterrent by all means and methods now that the situation has reached the worst phase due to the extremely hostile act of the United States.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, July 17, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, July 17, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, July 17, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. UN Resolution on DPRK 2. G8 on DPRK Missile Tests 3. ASEAN on DPRK Missile Tests 4. ROK on DPRK Provocative Acts 5. Inter-Korean Relations 6. Inter-Korean Unification Festival 7. PRC-Russia Relations on DPRK 8. ROK on DPRK […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 06-56A: The Illusion of Operational Readiness of National Missile Defense

Lt. General Robert Gard, Senior Military Fellow at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, and John D. Isaacs, Senior Policy Director at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, write, “It is irresponsible to squander such large amounts on national missile defense when there are higher priority defense and domestic programs that remain under-funded… It is far more likely that rogue states or terrorists will obtain a nuclear weapon or nuclear materials and smuggle a nuclear device into the United States than delivering one by an ICBM.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, July 13, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, July 13, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, July 13, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. UN Resolution on DPRK 2. Inter-Korean Ministerial Talks 3. DPRK-PRC Relations 4. DPRK on ROK-NATO Affiliation 5. US-ROK Security Alliance 6. US Military Sales to the ROK 7. US-ROK Trade Relations 8. US-Japan Missile Defense Cooperation 9. Japan-PRC […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, July 12, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, July 12, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, July 12, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. UN DPRK Sanctions Proposal 2. US-PRC Relations on DPRK 3. PRC on DPRK-US Relations 4. ROK on DPRK Missile Tests 5. Japan on DPRK Preemptive Strike Threat 6. Inter-Korean Ministerial Talks 7. DPRK Missile Capacity 8. Indonesian-Korean Relations […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 06-55A: Kim Jong Il vs George W. Bush: American National Security in the Balance

Desaix Anderson, who served for thirty-five years as a Foreign Service Officer at the U.S. State Department, working in and on Asian issues, was Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and the Pacific (1989-92) and executive director of the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO) for over three years, writes, “Rather than ‘staying the course,’ President Bush should move quickly past the UN resolution on the rockets, put the best face possible on these developments, rein in his hardliners, appoint a full-time, high-level, fully empowered Coordinator for the Korean Peninsula, and instruct the Coordinator and rest of the Bush government to work urgently, patiently, flexibly, and innovatively to achieve a comprehensive solution to the North Korean nuclear and missile issues.”

Go to the article