Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, October 26, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, October 26, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, October 26, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. ROK on DPRK Sanctions 2. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Talks 3. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Program 4. Japan on DPRK Nuclear Talks, Sanctions 5. PRC, France on DPRK Nuclear Issue 6. PRC on DPRK Sanctions 7. US on […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, October 25, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, October 25, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, October 25, 2006 1. US on DPRK Nuclear Arms Transfer 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Issue 3. US on DPRK Sanctions 4. DPRK Exports 5. DPRK Food Aid 6. DPRK on Inter-Korean Relations 7. ROK on Inter-Korean Relations 8. Russia on DPRK Nuclear Issue […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, October 24, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, October 24, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, October 24, 2006 1. DPRK on Nuclear Test 2. US on PRC on DPRK Nuclear Talks 3. PRC on DPRK Sanctions 4. PRC-DPRK Trade 5. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Test 6. US-ROK Security Alliance 7. Japan on DPRK Sanctions 8. DPRK Ship Searched 9. […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, October 23, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, October 23, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, October 23, 2006 1. US, PRC on DPRK Nuclear Issue 2. US Financial Pressure on the DPRK 3. US, ROK on DPRK Sanctions 4. DPRK on Nuclear Test 5. DPRK Food Aid 6. Impact of Sanctions on the DPRK 7. PRC on DPRK Nuclear […]

Go to the article

Technical Analysis of the DPRK Nuclear Test

Jungmin Kang, Science Fellow at the Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC) at Stanford University, and Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute Executive Director, write, “Having tested and failed, the DPRK can no longer rely on opacity as the basis for having a credible nuclear force, at least sufficiently credible to threaten its adversaries with a nuclear explosion. The DPRK might believe that a half kilotonne “mininuke” still provides it with a measure of nuclear deterrence and compellence; but it could not rely on other nuclear weapons states to perceive it to have anything more than an unusable, unreliable and relatively small nuclear explosive device.”

Go to the article

Technical Analysis of the DPRK Nuclear Test

Jungmin Kang, Science Fellow at the Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC) at Stanford University, and Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute Executive Director, write, “Having tested and failed, the DPRK can no longer rely on opacity as the basis for having a credible nuclear force, at least sufficiently credible to threaten its adversaries with a nuclear explosion. The DPRK might believe that a half kilotonne “mininuke” still provides it with a measure of nuclear deterrence and compellence; but it could not rely on other nuclear weapons states to perceive it to have anything more than an unusable, unreliable and relatively small nuclear explosive device.”

Go to the article

Technical Analysis of the DPRK Nuclear Test

Jungmin Kang, Science Fellow at the Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC) at Stanford University, and Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute Executive Director, write, “Having tested and failed, the DPRK can no longer rely on opacity as the basis for having a credible nuclear force, at least sufficiently credible to threaten its adversaries with a nuclear explosion. The DPRK might believe that a half kilotonne “mininuke” still provides it with a measure of nuclear deterrence and compellence; but it could not rely on other nuclear weapons states to perceive it to have anything more than an unusable, unreliable and relatively small nuclear explosive device.”

Go to the article

Policy Forum 06-90: North Korea has the Bomb. Now What?

Bennett Ramberg, who served in the State Department during President George H.W. Bush’s administration and is the author of three books on international security, writes, “Finally, give the North a greater stake in its financial future – and reduce its isolation and paranoia – by encouraging the South’s efforts at economic engagement. Economic intercourse may deliver another benefit. It could abate Pyongyang’s incentive to sell military equipment – including nuclear materials, or even weapons – to generate hard currency. However, we cannot rely on this tack.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, October 19, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, October 19, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, October 19, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. Inter-Korean Relations and DPRK Sanctions 2. DPRK General on ABC Television 3. DPRK Refugee-Defectors 4. Aid to DPRK 5. US-ROK Security Alliance 6. US-ROK Trade Relations 7. US-Japan Joint Maritime Drills 8. US-Japan Missile Defense Cooperation 9. Japan-Vietnam […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, October 18, 2006

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, October 18, 2006 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, October 18, 2006 I. NAPSNet 1. Rice on UN Sactions 2. PRC – DPRK Relations 3. US News Network in the DPRK 4. Documentaries Provide Inside Look into DPRK 5. ROK on PSI 6. Japan on Nuclear Weapons 7. Yasukuni Shrine Issue 8. PRC-India […]

Go to the article