Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

Anticipating Six Party Energy Negotiations

Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute Executive Director and David von Hippel, Nautilus Institute Senior Associate, write, “In the long run… it is critical that a substantial fraction of the energy aid agreed to at the Six Party Talks result in developmental outcomes for the people living in the DPRK. Falling short of this goal will leave the DPRK highly insecure, and one of the essential girders of a non-nuclear future for the Korean Peninsula, the social and political stability of the DPRK, will collapse.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, May 30, 2007

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, May 30, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, May 30, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. US-PRC on Six Party Talks 2. Russian Sanctions on DPRK 3. DMZ Fences 4. Inter-Korean Relations 5. ROK-US FTA negotiations 6. ROK-Indian Military Relations 7. ROK-ASEAN Trade Relations 8. Japan-Australian Defense Cooperation 9. Japan Political Scandal 10. Cross […]

Go to the article

Fueling DPRK Energy Futures and Energy Security: 2005 Energy Balance, Engagement Options, and Future Paths

Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute Executive Director and David von Hippel, Nautilus Institute Senior Associate, write, “This document is intended to provide a best estimate, given available data, of an internally-consistent year 2005 energy supply/demand balance for the DPRK, as well as balances for previous years prepared with similar methodologies… As this report is being finalized, the representatives of the countries participating in the Six-Party Talks on the DPRK’s nuclear program have come to an initial agreement on steps to be taken to address the differences between the parties. Provision of energy security is a critical element of a successful and robust resolution to the nuclear confrontation between the DPRK and the international community.”

Attachments are available here.

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, May 29, 2007

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, May 29, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, May 29, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. Hill on DPRK Nuclear Program 2. ASEM on DPRK Nuclear Program 3. Inter-Korean Relations 4. US-ROK Trade Relations 5. ROK-PRC History Dispute 6. ROK Press Restrictions 7. Japan Defense Policy 8. US on PRC Military 9. Cross Strait […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, May 28, 2007

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, May 28, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, May 28, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. US on BDA Issue 2. Russia on DPRK Nuclear Program 3. ROK Military 4. DPRK Missile Program 5. ROK, US on DPRK Missile Program 6. ROK Military Exercises 7. ROK-Mongolian Relations 8. PRC-Japan East Sea Territorial Dispute 9. […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 07-041: Lessons from the BDA Issue

Keun-sik Kim, Professor at the Institute for Far Eastern Studies at Kyungnam University, writes, “Considering that the role of third parties has been severely limited in breaking the stalemate, one lesson to be learned from the BDA issue is that bilateral frameworks must be in sync with the multilateral framework. Not only DPRK-U.S. negotiations but also simultaneous, active discussion between the U.S. and China, North Korea and China, and the two Koreas can serve as a buffer to help resolve issues.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, May 24, 2007

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, May 24, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, May 24, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. US on Six Party Talks 2. ROK Aid to DPRK 3. Inter-Korean Business and Peace 4. US-ROK Trade Relations 5. Japan Climate Change Initiative 6. Sino-Japanese Relations 7. PRC-US Trade Relations 8. PRC Rural Unrest 9. PRC Rural […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, May 23, 2007

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, May 23, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, May 23, 2007 ——— 1. Trilateral Consultation Group on DPRK 2. Inter-Korean Relations 3. DPRK Film at Cannes Festival 4. ROK-PRC Military Relations 5. USFJ Base Realignment 6. Japan Constitutional Revision 7. PRC-US Trade Relations 8. PRC African Diplomacy 9. PRC Environment 10. PRC […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 07-040: The New Nuclear Arms Race

Hugh White, Visiting Fellow at the Lowy Institute and Professor of Strategic Studies at ANU, writes, “Short of the elimination of nuclear weapons, the US and China can moderate their nuclear competition and reduce the risk of nuclear war by reaching an agreement about the size and nature of each other’s nuclear forces, offensive and defensive.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, May 22, 2007

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, May 22, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, May 22, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. DPRK-Japan Relations 2. Inter-Korean Trade 3. Inter-Korean Maritime Relations 4. US-Japan-Australia Missile Defense Cooperation 5. Japan Trade Relations 6. UN on Comfort Women Issue 7. Sino-US Trade Relations 8. PRC on US Export Controls 9. US on PRC […]

Go to the article