Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

Policy Forum 10-038: North Korea’s Choice: Bombs over Electricity

Siegfried S. Hecker is professor (research), Department of Management Science and Engineering, co-director of the Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC), Stanford University, and an NAE member. Sean C. Lee is a research assistant, and Chaim Braun is a consulting professor at CISAC. They write, “the next Six-Party negotiations must balance the disincentives the parties can bring to bear on North Korea if it chooses to keep the bomb—namely further international sanctions and isolation—with incentives for greater security and economic development… Instead of remaining fixated on denuclearization, Washington should realize that, in spite of its inconsistent and often contradictory policies during the past 20 years, diplomacy has left Pyongyang with only a handful of bombs, instead of the 100 or more it might have had by now, and essentially no significant nuclear-generated electricity.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 13 July, 2010

  1. I. NAPSNet
  2. DPRK on Naval Ship Sinking
  3. Sino-DPRK Relations
  4. DPRK-Japan Relations
  5. ROK on Naval Ship Sinking
  6. Inter-Korean Relations
  7. Inter-Korean Economic Relations
  8. Israel on DPRK Arms Exports
  9. DPRK Development Aid
  10. US-ROK Security Alliance
  11. US-ROK Joint Naval Exercises
  12. ROK-Burmese Relations
  13. ROK Environment
  14. Japan Politics
  15. Japanese Peacekeeping Operations
  16. USFJ Base Relocation
  17. Sino-US Relations
  18. Cross-Strait Relations
  19. PRC Energy Infrastructure
  20. PRC Environment
  21. PRC Internet Control
Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 13 July, 2010

  1. I. NAPSNet
  2. DPRK on Naval Ship Sinking
  3. Sino-DPRK Relations
  4. DPRK-Japan Relations
  5. ROK on Naval Ship Sinking
  6. Inter-Korean Relations
  7. Inter-Korean Economic Relations
  8. Israel on DPRK Arms Exports
  9. DPRK Development Aid
  10. US-ROK Security Alliance
  11. US-ROK Joint Naval Exercises
  12. ROK-Burmese Relations
  13. ROK Environment
  14. Japan Politics
  15. Japanese Peacekeeping Operations
  16. USFJ Base Relocation
  17. Sino-US Relations
  18. Cross-Strait Relations
  19. PRC Energy Infrastructure
  20. PRC Environment
  21. PRC Internet Control
Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 12 July, 2010

  1. I. Napsnet
  2. ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  3. UNSC on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  4. DPRK on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  5. Russia on ROK Ship Sinking
  6. DPRK on Six-Party Talks
  7. PRC on Six-Party Talks
  8. ROK on Six-Party Talks
  9. US on DPRK Threat
  10. DPRK Defectors
  11. DPRK Leadership
  12. US-ROK Military Exercises
  13. PRC on US-ROK Naval Exercises
  14. US-ROK Military Alliance
  15. ROK Politics
  16. Korean War Atrocities
  17. Japanese Politics
  18. PRC Territorial Disputes
  19. Cross Strait Relations
  20. PRC Separatism
Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 12 July, 2010

  1. I. Napsnet
  2. ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  3. UNSC on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  4. DPRK on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  5. Russia on ROK Ship Sinking
  6. DPRK on Six-Party Talks
  7. PRC on Six-Party Talks
  8. ROK on Six-Party Talks
  9. US on DPRK Threat
  10. DPRK Defectors
  11. DPRK Leadership
  12. US-ROK Military Exercises
  13. PRC on US-ROK Naval Exercises
  14. US-ROK Military Alliance
  15. ROK Politics
  16. Korean War Atrocities
  17. Japanese Politics
  18. PRC Territorial Disputes
  19. Cross Strait Relations
  20. PRC Separatism
Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 9 July, 2010

  1. I. NAPSNet
  2. UNSC on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  3. US-ROK Security Alliance
  4. ROK Military
  5. PRC on US-ROK Naval Exercise
  6. Inter-Korean Relations
  7. US-DPRK Relations
  8. Japan Sanctions on the DPRK
  9. DPRK Detention of Americans
  10. PRC on DPRK Defectors
  11. DPRK Energy Supply
  12. ROK Politics
  13. ROK-Japan Relations
  14. Japan Politics
  15. USFJ Base Relocation
  16. Japan Maritime Security Exercise
  17. Japanese Whaling
  18. Sino-Russian Energy Cooperation
  19. Cross-Strait Relations
  20. PRC Tibet Development
Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 9 July, 2010

  1. I. NAPSNet
  2. UNSC on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  3. US-ROK Security Alliance
  4. ROK Military
  5. PRC on US-ROK Naval Exercise
  6. Inter-Korean Relations
  7. US-DPRK Relations
  8. Japan Sanctions on the DPRK
  9. DPRK Detention of Americans
  10. PRC on DPRK Defectors
  11. DPRK Energy Supply
  12. ROK Politics
  13. ROK-Japan Relations
  14. Japan Politics
  15. USFJ Base Relocation
  16. Japan Maritime Security Exercise
  17. Japanese Whaling
  18. Sino-Russian Energy Cooperation
  19. Cross-Strait Relations
  20. PRC Tibet Development
Go to the article

Policy Forum 10-037: The North Korean Worker’s Party Meeting of September 2010:  Perpetuation of the Living Leader System or Transformation to the Enshrined Leader System?

Ruediger Frank, Professor of East Asian Economy and Society art the University of Vienna, writes, “the wording of the announcement, formal issues, the short-term problem of creating legitimacy for a yet widely unknown grandson of Kim Il-sung, and a more systematic long-term analytical perspective suggest that the Party meeting in September will likely not announce a successor for Kim Jong-il, but rather create or upgrade a collective. This might or might not include Kim Jong-un; but it is hard to imagine that such a collective will not be headed by Kim Jong-il.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 8 July, 2010

  1. I. NAPSNet
  2. DPRK on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  3. Russia on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  4. Russia-PRC-DPRK Relations
  5. Japan on DPRK Sanctions
  6. DPRK-Japan Relations
  7. DPRK Leadership
  8. Aid to the DPRK
  9. ROK on DPRK Defectors
  10. Russia on DPRK Refugees
  11. ROK-India Nuclear Collaboration
  12. ROK Afghanistan Dispatch
  13. ROK-Japan Relations
  14. US-Japan Nuclear Pact
  15. Japan on Nuclear Non-Proliferation
  16. Japan Politics
  17. Sino-Pakistani Relations
  18. Cross Strait Relations
Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 8 July, 2010

  1. I. NAPSNet
  2. DPRK on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  3. Russia on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
  4. Russia-PRC-DPRK Relations
  5. Japan on DPRK Sanctions
  6. DPRK-Japan Relations
  7. DPRK Leadership
  8. Aid to the DPRK
  9. ROK on DPRK Defectors
  10. Russia on DPRK Refugees
  11. ROK-India Nuclear Collaboration
  12. ROK Afghanistan Dispatch
  13. ROK-Japan Relations
  14. US-Japan Nuclear Pact
  15. Japan on Nuclear Non-Proliferation
  16. Japan Politics
  17. Sino-Pakistani Relations
  18. Cross Strait Relations
Go to the article