Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

Nautilus Institute PFO 00-05: Koreans Take Steps to Solve Their Own Problems

Nautilus Institute PFO 00-05: Koreans Take Steps to Solve Their Own Problems Nautilus Institute PFO 00-05: Koreans Take Steps to Solve Their Own Problems PFO 00-05C: June 29, 2000 After the Korean Summit: Into Thick Air? By Peter Hayes CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Essay by Peter Hayes III. Nautilus Invites Your Responses Go to essay […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 28 June, 2000

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. Chung Ju-yung’s DPRK Visit
2. ROK-Russian Relations
3. Cross-Straits Relations
4. Alleged PRC Proliferation
5. US Computer Sales to PRC
6. Japanese Red Army Suspect
7. Japanese War Reparations
8. US Missile Defense
II. Republic of Korea 1. DPRK Official’s Visit to US
2. Reunion of Separated Families
3. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
4. Chung Ju-yung’s DPRK Visit
5. KEDO Meeting
6. ROK-US Policy Coordination
7. ROK-US Security Talks
8. ROK Missile Development
III. People’s Republic of China 1. ROK-DPRK Red Cross Meeting
2. US Policy toward the DPRK
3. DPRK Drought
4. Kim Jong-il’s Inspection
5. ROK Economy
6. Anniversary of Korea War
7. Implications of Korean Summit on Taiwan
8. The Taiwan Issue
9. PRC-US Relations

Go to the article

Policy Forum 00-05B: Let’s Not Get Summit Slap-Happy in Korea

This article is by Professor Victor Cha, an East Asia security specialist in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University, Washington DC. He is currently a Senior Fulbright Scholar in South Korea. Cha argues that the summit meeting in Pyongyang was long on atmospherics and short on substance. He says that while the summit had important cathartic effects on the Korean psyche, the hard work has yet to be done. He maintains that reunification and withdrawal of US troops are not issues that are going to be solved in the near term.

Go to the discussion.

Go to the article

Nautilus Institute PFO 00-05: Koreans Take Steps to Solve Their Own Problems

Nautilus Institute PFO 00-05: Koreans Take Steps to Solve Their Own Problems Nautilus Institute PFO 00-05: Koreans Take Steps to Solve Their Own Problems PFO 00-05B: June 27, 2000 Let’s Not Summit Slap-Happy in Korea By Victor Cha CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Essay by Victor Cha III. Nautilus Invites Your Responses Discussion Go to essay […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 27 June, 2000

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. ROK-DPRK Red Cross Talks
2. Remains of US Soldiers from Korean War
3. ROK Cultural Imports from Japan
4. Cross-Straits Relations
5. Lee Teng-hui’s Visit to Britain
6. PRC Proliferation
7. Alleged PRC Computer Diversion

Go to the article

Policy Forum 00-05A: Koreans Take Steps to Solve Their Own Problems

This article by Timothy L. Savage, Program Officer for Global Peace and Security at the Nautilus Institute, appeared in the Korea Herald on June 21. Savage argues that the summit was an important first step in breaking down the ideological barrier that separates the two Koreas. By embracing Kim Dae-jung, DPRK leader Kim Jong-il signaled a move away from the official designation of the ROK as a puppet state, thus opening up the space to a “Korean” solution to the ongoing problem of the divided peninsula.

Go to the discussion.

Go to the article

Nautilus Institute PFO 00-05: Koreans Take Steps to Solve Their Own Problems

Nautilus Institute PFO 00-05: Koreans Take Steps to Solve Their Own Problems Nautilus Institute PFO 00-05: Koreans Take Steps to Solve Their Own Problems PFO 00-05A: June 26, 2000 Koreans Take Steps to Solve Their Own Problems By Timothy L. Savage CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Essay by Timothy L. Savage III. Nautilus Invites Your Responses […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 26 June, 2000

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. US Troops in ROK
2. ROK-DPRK Red Cross Talks
3. US-DPRK Missile Talks
4. ROK Missile Development
5. US-ROK-Japan Policy Coordination
6. ROK-DPRK Relations
7. Korean War Anniversary
8. US-PRC Relations
9. PRC Military Planning
10. PRC Threat to Taiwan
11. PRC Military Exercises
12. Taiwan Military Exercises
13. PRC News Agency in Washington
14. US Troops in Japan
15. Japanese Elections
16. US-Russian Defense Talks
17. US Congressional Security Panel
II. Republic of Korea 1. Military Hotline
2. Family Reunion
3. ROK Security Law
4. Alterations of DPRK Law
5. Inter-Korean Railway
III. Australia 1. Australian Views of Summit

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 22 June, 2000

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. US Sanctions on DPRK
2. US-DPRK Missile Talks
3. ROK-DPRK Summit
4. Japanese View of Summit
5. Businesses in DPRK
6. Korean War Massacre
7. Albright’s PRC Visit
8. PRC-US Relations
9. PRC News Agency in Washington
10. Dalai Lama’s Washington Visit
11. PRC Olympic Bid
12. US Missile Defense
II. Republic of Korea 1. DPRK Official’s Visit to ROK
2. DPRK Leader’s Visit to ROK
3. US Forces in ROK
4. DPRK-Japan Relations
5. US Sanctions on DPRK
6. Coca-Cola in DPRK

Go to the article

NAPSNET Weekly FLASH Update 20 June, 2000

Arms Control and Disarmament 1. US Nuclear Posture Review a. A bill passed by the U.S. Senate for the 2001 defense budget directs the Defense and Energy departments to conduct a new Nuclear Posture Review. Reversing previous legislation, the bill also orders a study on low-yield nuclear weapons and permits the nuclear laboratories to “conduct […]

Go to the article