Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

NAPSNet Daily Report 26 February, 2002

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. Hu US Visit
2. PRC-US Weapons Proliferation
3. Cross-Straits Relations
4. Taiwan’s Domestic View of US and PRC
5. PRC Domestic Politics
6. US-Philippines Anti-terror War
7. Inter-Korean Lunar Celebration
8. DPRK-ROK Relations
II. Republic of Korea 1. ROK–DPRK New Year Celebration
2. PRC Strategies for Korean Peninsula
3. DPRK–US Relations
4. Dorasan Station

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 25 February, 2002

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. US Nuclear Policy
2. PRC Domestic Politics
3. PRC’s View of Bush PRC Trip
4. US Defense Disinformation Policy
5. US Defense Budget
6. DPRK-US Relations
7. Russia Nuclear Safety
8. DPRK-Japan Spy Boat Incident

Go to the article

NAPSNET Week in Review 22 February, 2002

United States 1. US Nuclear Policy The Bush administration is no longer standing by a 24-year-old US pledge not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states, a senior administration official said yesterday. John Bolton, undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, said in an interview, “The idea that fine theories of deterrence work […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 22 February, 2002

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. US Nuclear Policy
2. Bush PRC Visit
3. DPRK-US Diplomatic Relations
4. US-ROK-DPRK Diplomatic Relations
5. US-Philippines Anti-terror War
6. ROK Olympic Boycott
II. People’s Republic of China 1. US-DPRK Relations
2. Bush’s Japan Visit
3. Bush’s PRC Visit
4. PRC-US Relations
5. PRC-Japanese Relations
6. US-Russian Negotiation on Arms Control
III. Japan 1. Bush Japan Visit
2. Japan’s View of “Axis of Evil”
3. Japan Immigration Violations

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 21 February, 2002

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. Bush PRC Visit
2. PRC-US Weapons Proliferation
3. PRC-US role with DPRK
4. Jiang US Visit
5. Cross-Straits Relations
6. Taiwan’s View of Bush Asia Tour
7. ROK’s View of Bush Asia Tour
II. Japan 1. Japan’s Role in US-Iran Relations
2. Japan’s Embassy in Kabul
3. Japan-Pakistan Relations

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 20 February, 2002

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. US-ROK Summit
2. DPRK-US Relations
3. PRC-US Visit
4. Taiwan-US Arms Sales
II. Republic of Korea 1. US Pacific Security
2. Anti-Bush Protests

Go to the article

Policy Forum 02-01A: Avoiding War on the Korean Peninsula

The following article was contributed by Peter M. Beck, Director of Research at the Korea Economic Institute of America. Beck argues that the Bush administration’s current campaign against North Korea has more to do with political convenience than it does with combating terrorism. Consequently, Beck asserts that if the Bush administration has decided to be part of the problem rather than part of the solution, then it is ultimately up to the North and the South to determine the fate of the Korean Peninsula.

Go to the article

Policy Forum 02-02A: North Korea – the Case for Micro Level Engagement

The following article was contributed by Bryan Port who is presently a graduate student at Georgetown University and an analyst with SAIC supporting a military client. Port asserts that the present Sunshine Policy is incapable of dealing with a politically deteriorating North Korea and ineffective in terms of threat reduction and reunification. Consequently, Port argues that micro-projects must be put in place to prepare for the inevitable collapse of North Korea. Port offers pragmatic examples of micro-engagement such as North-South joint reforestation programs, information technology, infrastructure improvement, and municipal management.

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 19 February, 2002

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. Bush Japan Visit
2. Bush ROK Visit
3. ROK Domestic Politics
4. Taiwan-US Relations
5. Taiwan-US Military Relations
6. PRC-US Relations
7. Russia-US Arms Control Talks
II. Republic of Korea 1. Security for Bush’s Visit
2. Anti-Bush Protest
3. Civic Movement Against U.S.
4. DMZ Arms Issues
5. DPRK Conventional Weaponry
6. Separated Family Issue
III. Japan 1. ASDF Documents Lost
2. Japan’s View on Subcritical Nuclear Test
3. Japan’s View on “Axis of Evil”

Go to the article

NAPSNET Week in Review 15 February, 2002

United States 1. US Policy and the “Axis of Evil” US President George W. Bush said he would keep “all options available” for dealing with Iran, Iraq and the DPRK. “Make no mistake about it, if we need to, we will take necessary action to defend the American people. And I think that statement was […]

Go to the article