Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

Policy Forum 02-18A: North Korea’s Nuclear Program: An Assessment Of U.S. Options

The analysis below is by Steve LaMontagne, senior analyst at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation in Washington, DC. LaMontagne notes that the Bush administration faces the same set of policy options as did the Clinton administration in the early 1990s when North Korea threatened to pull out of the Non-Proliferation Treaty: War, Isolation, or Diplomacy. While war and isolation entail considerable risks, diplomatic negotiations may find little support on Capitol Hill and among administration hawks who bristle at the thought of being blackmailed by Kim Jong Il. The key test of the administration’s commitment to a diplomatic solution to the North Korea nuclear problem will be whether or not it abandons diplomacy at the first sign of stubborn, erratic, or objectionable behavior by North Korea. If this happens, diplomacy could eventually give way to the threat of military action.

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 30 October, 2002

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. DPRK on Non-Aggression Treaty
2. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Issue
3. DPRK Nuclear Issue
4. DPRK-Japan Relations
5. PRC Domestic Politics
6. DPRK-Canada Relations
7. Cross-Straits Relations
II. Republic of Korea 1. DPRK-Japan Normalization Talk
2. US Response to DPRK
3. DPRK’s Urge of Joint Defense
4. ROK President’s Sunshine Ongoing

Go to the article

Policy Forum 02-16A: Deja Vu All Over Again?

The essay below is by Ralph A. Cossa President of Pacific Forum CSIS. Cossa asserts that what President Bush needs to do during his summit meeting with ROK President Kim Dae-jung and Japanese Prime Minister Koizumi Junichiro is to clearly spell out his preconditions for a resumption of US-DPRK dialogue. Moreover, President Bush should also reiterate his administration’s pledge to engage in constructive dialogue, once Washington’s immediate security concerns are satisfactorily (and verifiably) addressed. Japanese Prime Minister Koizumi should make it clear in his own statement that, while dialogue will continue, there will be no real progress toward normalization until the nuclear issue is resolved. Finally, South Korean President Kim, instead of pressuring Washington to resume talks with Pyongyang, must also endorse Washington’s preconditions and announce that further progress in North-South relations, and especially hard currency payments that could easily be diverted to pay for a nuclear weapons program, will also hinge on Pyongyang removing this clear and present danger to the people of South Korea.

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 29 October, 2002

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. Japan on DPRK Nuclear Weapons
2. Japan-DPRK Talks
3. DPRK on DPRK Nuclear Weapons
4. DPRK Nuclear Speculation
5. PRC-US Relations
6. PRC Domestic Politics
7. Post-PRC-US Summit
8. DPRK Economic Survey Team
9. ROK on DPRK Economic Sanctions
10. DPRK-Canada Relations
II. Republic of Korea 1. APEC Countries Cooperation against Terrorism
2. DPRK-Japan Normalization Talk
3. ROK-Chile Summit Talk
III. People’s Republic of China 1. PRC-US Relations
2. PRC Commentary on PRC-US Relations
3. Japan-DPRK Relations
4. DPRK-ROK Relations
5. DPRK-US Relations
6. US, Japan and ROK’s Attitude towards DPRK Nuclear Issue

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 28 October, 2002

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. APEC on DPRK Weapons Program
2. DPRK on Nuclear Weapons
3. Japan-DPRK Relations
4. RF on DPRK Nuclear Weapons
5. Powell on ‘Global Unity’ on DPRK Nuclear Issue
6. DPRK Nuclear Speculation
7. PRC Domestic Politics
8. DPRK US Soldier Remains
9. PRC Yasukuni Shrine Warning
10. Cross-Straits Relations
11. DPRK Food Production
12. Japanese Abduction Issue
II. Republic of Korea 1. APEC Statement on DPRK
2. Nuclear Bombs in DPRK
3. Inter-Korean Economic Exchange

Go to the article

NAPSNET Week in Review 25 October, 2002

United States 1. US-RF Response to DPRK Nuclear Weapons Development US Under Secretary of State John R. Bolton briefed Russian officials for a second day today on US intelligence evidence that the DPRK has an active nuclear weapons program. Russian officials, who indicated on Monday that the initial evidence fell short of proof, were silent […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 02-13A: Get the Message Right at APEC – North Korea’s Last Gambit

The essay below, by Professor Victor D. Cha, Director of the American Alliances in Asia Project at Georgetown University, argues that President Bush’s meetings with Asian leaders at the APEC summit in Mexico this weekend provide the opportune moment to get the message right with regard to North Korea’s surprise admission of a secret nuclear weapons program. Over the past week, a debate has raged inside the US government and among outside experts about how to respond. Many moderates have argued that this new nuclear revelation is North Korean leader Kim Jong-Il’s perverse but typical way of creating crisis to pull a reluctant Bush administration into serious dialogue. Before the world accepts the North’s confession as a cry for help, Bush must convince his counterparts at Los Labos to see Pyongyang’s actions for what they are — a serious violation of a standing agreement that will in effect be North Korea’s last gambit at peaceful engagement with the United States and its allies.

Go to the article

Policy Forum 02-14A: Response to “Agreed Framework Is Brain Dead; Shotgun Wedding Is the Only Option to Defuse Crisis”

Below is commentary by Hugo Wheegook Kim and Peter Hayes on Kim Myong Chol’s “Agreed Framework Is Brain Dead; Shotgun Wedding Is the Only Option to Defuse Crisis” posted on NAPSNet of October 24, 2002. The original piece can be found

Go to the article

Policy Forum 02-15A: Can North Korea’s Perestroika Succeed?

The essay below is by Wada Haruki, Emeritus Professor of the University of Tokyo and a specialist in Russian and Korean history and politics. Haruki notes that while North Korea’s recent Japanese abduction admission and apologies are significant, North Korea must make much more clear how the people were abducted and how they died, punish those responsible for carrying out the crimes. They must search out the remains and hand them over, and make it possible for families to visit the graves of the deceased and to meet with survivors, and for the survivors to return to Japan. Despite all this, it is extremely important that agreement was reached at the Japan-North Korea summit to reopen the normalization talks and that basic principles were agreed for the deadlocked diplomatic negotiations. This is profoundly significant for the peace of Northeast Asia.

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 25 October, 2002

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. DPRK Non-Aggression Pact
2. US Response to DPRK Overture
3. APEC DPRK Summit
4. PRC-US Relations
5. PRC Domestic Politics
6. Japan Abduction Issue
7. DPRK Economic Survey Team
8. Perry and Carter on DPRK-US Relations
II. Republic of Korea 1. Inter Korean Ministerial Talk
2. Cutoff of Oil by US
3. ROK’s Efforts to Prevent Terrorism
III. CanKor E-Clipping Service 1. Issue #103

Go to the article