Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

NAPSNet Daily Report 14 April, 2003

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. DPRK on DPRK Nuclear Stance
2. DPRK Multilateral Talks?
3. US Response to DPRK Multilateral Talks
4. Japan on DPRK Multilateral Talks
5. SARS Virus
6. Japan Domestic Economy
7. Japan Domestic Politics
II. People’s Republic of China 1. Japan’s Oncoming Military Exercises
2. Russia-ROK Talk on DPRK Issue
3. PRC-ROK Relations
4. ROK-US Relations
5. DPRK-US Relations
6. Russia-US Relations
7. DPRK-ROK Relations
8. PRC’s Attitude towards DPRK Issue
9. PRC-Japan Relations
10. DPRK-Japan Relations
11. ROK Weapons Development
12. DPRK’s Stance on Nuke Issue
13. ROK’s Attitude towards DPRK Issue
III. Japan 1. Japan-RF Relations
2. Japan-PRC Relations
3. Japan-DPRK Relations
4. Japan’s Role in Iraq War

Go to the article

NAPSNET Week in Review 11 April, 2003

Korean Peninsula 1. UN DPRK Talks The U.N. Security Council failed to reach agreement on Thursday on a common approach to confronting the DPRK for its plans to reactivate an atomic energy program capable of producing nuclear bombs. Facing stiff PRC and Russian opposition to U.N. action, the US, France and Britain temporarily ended their […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 11 April, 2003

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. DPRK War Readiness
2. PRC-US Espionage
3. ROK Stealth Warship
4. PRC and US on Iraq and DPRK
5. Russia on DPRK Nuclear Inspections
6. DPRK Black Market Exports
7. ROK New US Ambassador Appointment
8. ROK-US Relations on DPRK and Iraq
9. DPRK-PRC Nuclear Relations
10. Russia on DPRK Economic Sanctions
11. SARS as Mutant Cold Virus
12. PRC Executions
13. US on UN PRC Human Rights Resolution
14. Japan Environment Tax
II. Japan 1. Japan’s Role in Iraq War
2. Japan’s ODA Policy
3. US Bases in Okinawa
4. Japan’s New Military Plane
5. Japanese Logistic Support for US
6. Japan-PRC Relations
7. Japan’s Role in Iraq
8. Japan’s Position on DPRK’s Withdrawal from NPT

Go to the article

Policy Forum 03-29A: A Role For Russia In Korean Settlement

This paper was originally prepared for the Task Force on U.S. Korea Policy sponsored by the Center for International Policy and Center for East Asian Studies, University of Chicago, Brookings Institution, Washington, January 9, 2003. The 28-member panel included Admiral William J. Crowe, Jr., former Chairman of the Joint-Chiefs of Staff; two former U.S. ambassadors to South Korea, Donald P. Gregg and James T. Laney; Lee H. Hamilton, Vice-Chairman of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States; Ambassador Robert L. Gallucci, who negotiated the 1994 Agreed Framework with North Korea; and Selig S. Harrison, Chairman of the Task Force, Director of the Asia Program at the Center for International Policy and a leading Korea expert; and the directors of research institutes specializing in Korea and East Asia at ten leading Universities. The Task Force convened on three occasions between November 2002 and January 2003. It was co-sponsored by the Center for International Policy and the Center for East Asian Studies of the University of Chicago. Funding was provided by the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation and the Center for East Asian Studies. For more information on the task force: http://www.ciponline.org/asia/

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 10 April, 2003

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. UN DPRK Talks
2. US on DPRK Nuclear Issue
3. PRC-Russia UN Statement Obstruction
4. Russia on DPRK Guarantee
5. Japan on DPRK NPT Withdrawal
6. DPRK Military
7. ROK US Army Relocation
8. PRC-US Counter-Intelligence
9. PRC SARS Data
10. Japan on Iraq Reconstruction
11. PRC on Iraq Reconstruction
12. ROK-US Presidential Meeting
13. Japan Nuclear Response Bill
14. ASEAN on DPRK Nukes
15. ROK Domestic Economy
II. Republic of Korea 1. ROK President Visit to US in May
2. ROK-US Military Talks
3. 3 North Koreans Repatriated
4. Opposition to Reduction and Relocation of US Troops
III. Japan 1. Japan’s Role in Iraq War
2. US on Japan’s Role in Iraq Reconstruction
3. Japan’s Economic Interest in Iraq
4. Japan Anti-War Sentiment

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 09 April, 2003

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. UN Security Council on DPRK
2. PRC UN DPRK Statement Blockage
3. KCNA on UN DPRK Resolution
4. US ROK Military Base Re-location
5. ROK-US Presidential Visit
6. US Soldiers in ROK on US-Led War on Iraq
7. DPRK on Japan Striking Distance
8. Japan on Iraq Aid
9. PRC SARS Cover-Up
10. SARS Status
11. SARS PRC-Hong Kong Relations
12. Japan Domestic Economics

Go to the article

Policy Forum 03-28A: Toward An ‘Asian’ North Korea

Mindy Kotler, director and founder of the Japan Information Access Project in Washington, DC, asserts that the Bush administration must examine its three fundamental assumptions of North Korea: 1) Kim Jong Il is a gangster and not a legitimate head of state; 2) North Korea is a client state of the People’s Republic of China; and 3) North Korea’s neighbors are not concerned with another Asian nuclear power. By failing to analyze these assumptions, the Bush administration has hindered a creative response to North Korea’s nuclear program.

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 08 April, 2003

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. DPRK Pakistan Missile Export?
2. ROK Stance on DPRK Missile Firing
3. ROK Parliament on US-Led War on Iraq
4. US Stealth Fighter Jets in ROK
5. Japan on Korean Peninsula
6. Japan on US-Led War on Iraq
8. Asia Response to SARS
9. PRC Response to Human Rights Report
10. Philippines on DPRK Impact on Regional Stability
11. DPRK Human Rights
12. US ROK Troop Realignment
13. KCNA on US Human Rights Report
II. Republic of Korea 1. Sending ROK Troops to Iraq?
2. Longer Station of US Forces for Drill
3. EUCCK toward DPRK for Investment
4. Human Rights Report on Two Koreas
III. CanKor E-Clipping 1. Issue #119

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report 07 April, 2003

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. DPRK-ROK Ministerial Talks Cancellation
2. DPRK on UN Resolutions
3. DPRK on US Attack
4. SARS Global Fatalities
5. PRC Response to SARS Scare
6. Japan Radicals US Base attack
7. DPRK Radio Broadcasts
8. Japan Human Shields in Iraq
II. People’s Republic of China 1. The DPRK Nuke Issue
2. Shanghai Co-operation Organization
3. US-Russian Ties
4. ROK-US Relations
5. PRC’s Disarmament Scheme
6. PRC-US Relations
7. Japan-PRC Relations
8. Russia-PRC Relations
III. Republic of Korea 1. Cancellation of Inter Korean Ministerial Talks
2. Three DPRK Defectors to ROK on Boat
3. ROK-US Cooperative Diplomacy on DPRK
4. DPRK Nuclear Issue to UN
5. USFK Downsizing and Relocation in Seoul
IV. Japan 1. Japan’s Role in Iraq War
2. Japanese Logistic Support for US
3. Japan’s Plutonium Storage
4. Japan Domestic Politics

Go to the article

NAPSNET Week in Review 4 April, 2003

Korean Peninsula 1. ROK Parliament on US-Led War on Iraq The ROK National Assembly has approved a government proposal to send 700 non-combatant troops to support the US-led war on Iraq. The vote was a victory for President Roh Moo-hyun, who had told parliament that the deployment was essential for pragmatic reasons. He said sending […]

Go to the article