Daily Report Archives
Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.
The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region. It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.
However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.
NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, September 13, 2004 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, September 13, 2004 United States 1. DPRK Blast Reported 2. US on DPRK Blast 3. Japan on DPRK Blast 4. ROK on DPRK Blast 5. DPRK on DPRK Blast 6. DPRK Blast Speculation 7. DPRK on DPRK Blast Speculation 8. DPRK Nuclear Talks 9. […]
Go to the article
The following is a paper by Jungmin Kang, Tatsujiro Suzuki, Peter Hayes. Jungmin Kang is an independent nuclear policy analyst in Seoul and Associate of Nautilus Institute; Tatsujiro Suzuki is a nuclear analyst affiliated with University of Tokyo in Tokyo; Peter Hayes is Director of Nautilus Institute in San Francisco.
Go to the article
The following is a paper by Cheong Wook-Sik, representative of the Civil Network for a Peaceful Korea. Cheong Wook-Sik writes, “in a situation in which finding a solution to the North Korean nuclear issue has been difficult enough, it seems clear that with the appearance of the South Korean uranium enrichment issue, the six-party talks have run into yet another potential problem. There is room, however, to turn this misfortune into a blessing.”
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, September 9, 2004 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, September 9, 2004 United States 1. ROK Plutonium Experiment Disclosure 2. US on ROK Plutonium Program 3. Japan on ROK Plutonium Experiment Disclosure 4. PRC on ROK Uranium Enrichment Disclosure 5. DPRK on ROK Uranium Enrichment Disclosure 6. US on Inter-Korean Relations 7. Japan […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, September 8, 2004 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, September 8, 2004 United States 1. ROK Uranium Enrichment Disclosure 2. DPRK on ROK Uranium Enrichment 3. ROK on Multilateral Talks 4. US on Multilateral Talks 5. Japan – DPRK Relations 6. Russian – DPRK Relations 7. Sino – DPRK Relations 8. Inter – […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, September 7, 2004 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, September 7, 2004 United States 1. ROK Nuclear Disclosure 2. ROK Nuclear Disclosure and the DPRK Nuclear Talks 3. ROK Nuclear Disclosure and US Troop Realignment 4. US on DPRK, ROK Nuclear Issues 5. DPRK on Nuclear Issue 6. DPRK HEU Program 7. Lessons […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, September 2, 2004 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, September 2, 2004 United States 1. ROK Nuclear Program 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Issue 3. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Issue 4. Russia on DPRK Nuclear Issue 5. Sino – DPRK Relations 6. Inter – Korean Relations 7. Inter – Korean Political Talks 8. […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, September 1, 2004 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, September 1, 2004 United States 1. US – DPRK Relations 2. US Elections and the DPRK Nuclear Issue 3. US on DPRK Nuclear Issue 4. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Issue 5. DPRK on US – DPRK Relations 6. ROK on DPRK Human Rights Bill […]
Go to the article
This is an except from a paper by Sook-Jong Lee, Korea Visiting Fellow at the Brookings Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies. Dr. Lee writes: Under these circumstances, it is imperative for the leadership in the U.S. and South Korea to take a long term view of the alliance. By avoiding excessive politicization, both governments should be able to redefine their alliance relationship in a way that suits their individual as well as mutual national interests.
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, August 31, 2004 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, August 31, 2004 United States 1. DPRK on Relations with the US 2. UK – DPRK Relations 3. UN on Libya – DPRK Relations 4. PRC on Multilateral Talks 5. Vietnamese – DPRK Relations 6. DPRK – Japanese Relations 7. DPRK Succession 8. DPRK […]
Go to the article
