Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

Policy Forum 05-36A: What Should US Do About North Korea?

Jason T. Shaplen, Policy Adviser at the Korean Peninsula Energy Organization (KEDO) from 1995-1999, and James Laney, U.S. Ambassador to South Korea from 1993-1997, write: “In Iraq, we had the luxury of destroying the regime first to bring about the change we sought. In North Korea the opposite is true. We must engage the regime first to end and ultimately reverse its nuclear program. We must therefore hold our noses in seeking to bring the North into the world community, including securing its membership in security forums, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank etc.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, April 27, 2005

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, April 27, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, April 27, 2005 I. United States 1. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks 2. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Talks 3. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Test 4. US-ROK Summit 5. Sino-ROK on DPRK Nuclear Issue 6. PRC on UNSC Sanctions on the DPRK 7. Inter-Korean Relations […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, April 26, 2005

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, April 26, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, April 26, 2005 I. United States 1. DPRK on Nuclear Talks 2. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Talks, Nuclear Test 3. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks, UN Sanctions 4. US-ROK on DPRK Nuclear Issue 5. US-PRC on DPRK Nuclear Issue 6. PRC on UN Sanctions […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 05-35A: A New Foreign Policy Paradigm: Perspectives on the Role of South Korea as a Balancer

Ruediger Frank, Professor of East Asian Political Economy at the University of Vienna, writes: “The recent efforts of South Korea’s president Roh Moo-hyun to establish the country not only as a mediator, but as a balancing power in Northeast Asia to prevent possible disputes in the region are an expression of the dissatisfaction with the progress made under the current arrangement and could be interpreted as a change of the Status quo that benefits Beijing at the expense of the alliance with Washington, which will nevertheless not be given up. Quite remarkably, this position of being an independent actor in international relations corresponds very well with the North Korean position and opens one more field of possible future cooperation of both Koreas.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, April 25, 2005

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, April 25, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, April 25, 2005 I. United States 1. US on DPRK Nuclear Test 2. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Test 3. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Test 4. DPRK on Nuclear Program 5. DPRK on Nuclear Issue 6. US, Japan on DPRK Nuclear Issue 7. US, ROK […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 05-42A: North Korea: Can the Iron Fist Accept the Invisible Hand?

The International Crisis Group, an independent, non-profit, multinational organization, working through field-based analysis and high-level advocacy to prevent and resolve deadly conflict, writes: “North Korea will not and should not receive significant international development assistance until it gives up its nuclear weapons, but it would be worthwhile trying already to develop a better understanding of the country’s economy and what it will require in the way of help. Whether the regime survives or not, North Korea will need officials who are better versed in economic matters and have a greater exposure to the world.”

Go to the article

Weekly report April 18 – 22 2005

Hayes Says China Substituting For American Power Peter Hayes, Nautilus Institute Executive Director, was quoted on Radio Australia saying “The reality is that the [US] State Department and other agencies … are rather desperately looking for ways to deal with the situation because if they don’t, then the United States stands to lose substantial face […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 05-34A: The Controversies of South Korean Society on the Issue of Human Rights in North Korea

Bohyuk Suh, an expert advisor at the National Human Rights Commission of Korea, writes: “The North Korean human rights issue should not be the only issue to be viewed, but rather, the general situation in and outside of Korea, and the task of settling for peace on the Korean peninsular, should be viewed together as a whole.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, April 21, 2005

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, April 21, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, April 21, 2005 I. United States 1. DPRK on Nuclear Issue 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Issue 3. DPRK on UN Sanctions 4. ROK on UN Sanctions on the DPRK 5. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Talks 6. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks 7. Japan […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, April 20, 2005

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, April 20, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, April 20, 2005 I. United States 1. ROK on UNSC Vote on the DPRK 2. Japan, US, ROK on DPRK Nuclear Issue 3. Russia on DPRK Nuclear Issue 4. Russia on Reactor Shutdown 5. ROK on DPRK Reactor Shutdown 6. DPRK on Reactor Shutdown […]

Go to the article