Daily Report Archives

Daily Report Archives

Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers  in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.

The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region.  It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.

However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.

NAPSNet

Policy Forum 07-015: Can the New Nuclear Deal with North Korea Succeed?

C. Kenneth Quinones, former State Department North Korea Director, writes, “Reaction understandably has been mixed. Paradoxically the strongest advocate appears to be President Bush, along with China and South Korea. Prime Minister Abe promptly voiced his displeasure. In Washington, both opponents and advocates of negotiations with North Korea have expressed substantial reservations. Even Pyongyang has emphasized publicly the agreement’s tentative nature. Ultimately, the lack of political support in many capitals and the new accords complexity and numerous areas of ambiguity will make successful implementation extremely difficult.”

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, February 20, 2007

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, February 20, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, February 20, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. Six Party Talks Agreement 2. DPRK Nuclear Programs and Six Party Talks 3. Inter-Korean Relations 4. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation 5. Inter-Korean Summit 6. Japan on Abductee Issue 7. DPRK Financial Transactions 8. DPRK Measles Outbreak 9. Korean Reunification […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, February 19, 2007

NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, February 19, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, February 19, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. US on Six Party Talks Agreement 2. ROK on Six Party Talks Agreement 3. DPRK Nuclear Issue 4. Inter-Korean Relations 5. DPRK Defense Posture 6. DPRK on ROK Elections 7. DPRK-Japan Relations 8. US-ROK Security Alliance 9. Japan […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Friday, February 16, 2007

NAPSNet Daily Report Friday, February 16, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Friday, February 16, 2007 Weekly ROK Report for Friday, February 16, 2007 1. IT ALL DEPENDS ON THE U.S.- NORTH KOREA COMPROMISE 2. SIX PARTY TALK ENDED WITHOUT ABROGATING DPRK NUKE 3. THE NUCLEAR WEAPONS OF PAST, PRESENT, FUTURE MUST ALL BE ABROGATED 4. THE […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, February 15, 2007

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, February 15, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, February 15, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. Six Party Talks 2. US Criticism of Nuclear Deal 3. DPRK on Six Party Deal 4. ROK and Japan on Six Party Deal 5. EU on Six Party Deal 6. Inter-Korean Relations Resume 7. Russia on DPRK Sanctions […]

Go to the article

Policy Forum 07-014: The Beijing Deal is not the Agreed Framework

Peter Hayes, Director of the Nautilus Institute and Professor of International Relations at RMIT University, writes, In short, whatever its shortcomings, the critics of the Beijing Deal who denounce it as simply the revival of the logic and scope of the old Agreed Framework have got it completely wrong. We are nowhere near a comprehensive agreement that captures the DPRK nuclear weapons program. Nor did the DPRK achieve a victory over the United States in Beijing. Rather, both sides wrestled the other …to the end.

Go to the article

The Beijing Deal is not the Agreed Framework

The Beijing Deal is not the Agreed Framework The Beijing Deal is not the Agreed Framework Policy Forum Online 07-014A: February 14th, 2007 The Beijing Deal is not the Agreed Framework By Peter Hayes CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Article by Peter Hayes III. Nautilus invites your responses I. Introduction Peter Hayes, Director of the Nautilus […]

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, February 14, 2007

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, February 14, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, February 14, 2007 1. Six Party Talks Joint Agreement 2. DPRK on Six Party Talks Joint Agreement 3. US on Six Party Talks Joint Agreement 4. ROK on Six Party Talks Joint Agreement 5. Japan on Six Party Talks Joint Agreement 6. Russia on […]

Go to the article

Initial Actions for the Implementation of the Joint Statement

The Third Session of the Fifth Round of the Six-Party Talks was held in Beijing among the People’s Republic of China, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the United States of America from 8 to 13 February 2007. The delegations agreed on this joint statement on February 13th, 2007.

Go to the article

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, February 13, 2007

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, February 13, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, February 13, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. Six Party Talks Breakthrough 2. Six Party Talks 3. Energy Sector in DPRK 4. DPRK Refugee-Defectors 5. US on PRC Anti-Satellite Program 6. PRC on Anti-Satellite Missile 7. ROK-US FTA Agreement 8. Explosions in US Base in Japan […]

Go to the article