Daily Report Archives
Established in December 1993, the Nautilus Institute’s *N*ortheast *A*sia *P*eace and *S*ecurity *N*etwork (NAPSNet) Daily Report served thousands of readers in more than forty countries, including policy makers, diplomats, aid organizations, scholars, donors, activists, students, and journalists.
The NAPSNet Daily Report aimed to serve a community of practitioners engaged in solving the complex security and sustainability issues in the region, especially those posed by the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program and the threat of nuclear war in the region. It was distributed by email rom 1993-1997, and went on-line in December 1997, which is when the archive on this site begins. The format at that time can be seen here.
However, for multiple reasons—the rise of instantaneous news services, the evolution of the North Korea and nuclear issues, the increasing demand for specialized and synthetic analysis of these and related issues, and the decline in donor support for NAPSNet—the Institute stopped producing the Daily Report news summary service as of December 17, 2010.
NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, September 26, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, September 26, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. Six Party Talks 2. US on DPRK Terror List Status 3. US Sanctions on the DPRK 4. ROK on PRC-DPRK Relations 5. Inter-Korean Relations 6. Japan Government 7. PRC Party Congress 8. PRC Environment 9. PRC Petitioners’ Village […]
Go to the article
Rhoda Margesson, Specialist in International Humanitarian Assistance in the Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division of the Congressional Research Service, Emma Chanlett-Avery, Analyst in Asian Affairs in the Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division of the Congressional Research Service, and Andorra Bruno, Specialist in Immigration Policy in the Domestic Social Policy Division of the Congressional Research Service, write, “Formulating policy toward North Korea has been characterized as deciding among a range of bad options. The following outlines some basic approaches to dealing with North Korea’s human rights and refugee issues advocated by various constituencies, with an analysis of some of the possible diplomatic and security related ramifications. United States policy has adopted elements of several of these strategies in the past and future policies will likely be a combination of approaches.”
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, September 25, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, September 25, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. Six Party Talks 2. Alleged Syria-DPRK Nuclear Deal 3. US on DPRK Terror List Status 4. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation 5. US-Japan Relations 6. Japan Government 7. Japan SDF Indian Ocean Mission 8. Yasukuni Shrine Issue 9. Sino-Japanese Military […]
Go to the article
Scott Snyder, senior associate with the Asia Foundation and Pacific Forum CSIS, writes, “Despite Kim’s strategic calculus, a second inter-Korean summit draws him further into the public light and diminishes the opacity surrounding the North Korean regime. Kim’s economic needs reveal his dependency on external aid, which should only be given transparently with the full approval of the Korean taxpayer.”
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, September 24, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, September 24, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. Six Party Talks 2. DPRK Nuclear Program 3. Alleged Syria-DPRK Nuclear Deal 4. Inter-Korean Summit 5. DPRK Floods 6. PRC Oil Exports to the DPRK 7. Japan Government 8. Japan SDF Indian Ocean Mission 9. PRC-Indian Territorial Dispute […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Friday, September 21, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Friday, September 21, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. Six Party Talks 2. Alleged Syria-DPRK Nuclear Deal 3. DPRK Floods 4. Inter-Korean Summit 5. Inter-Korean Agriculture Cooperation 6. ROK on DPRK Collapse 7. ROK Broadcasts in the DPRK 8. DPRK Economy 9. Japan Government 10. Japan SDF […]
Go to the article
Eric J. Ballbach, research associate of the Korea Communication and Research Center in Berlin, writes, “If we now compare the circumstances and political conditions of the first and the second summit, there appears to be a major similarity, namely the basic fact that both summits occur in a time when North Korea began to emerge from a phase of diplomatic isolation. Differently put: North Korea’s ‘Yes’ to the summit is inseparable connected with external developments in the Northeast Asian region – despite the internal dynamic of inter-Korean relations.”
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, September 20, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, September 20, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. Six Party Talks 2. DPRK Nuclear Program 3. DPRK Drug Trafficking 4. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation 5. ROK-EU Trade Relations 6. Japan SDF Indian Ocean Mission 7. Japan Government 8. Russia on US – Japan Relations 9. Cross Strait […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, September 19, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, September 19, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. Six Party Talks 2. Inter-Korean Summit 3. Northern Limit Line Issue 4. GNP DPRK Policy 5. ROK-EU Trade Relations 6. Japan SDF Indian Ocean Mission 7. Sino-Japanese Relations 8. Cross Strait Relations 9. Sino-Indian Relations 10. PRC Party […]
Go to the article
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, September 18, 2007 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, September 18, 2007 I. NAPSNet 1. Six Party Talks 2. Inter-Korean Summit 3. PRC HFO Shipment to the DPRK 4. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation 5. US-ROK Trade Relations 6. EU-ROK Trade Relations 7. Japan Government 8. Fukuda on SDF, Constitutional Revision 9. Japan-PRC Cooperation on […]
Go to the article
