by Roger Cavazos
May 23, 2013
Roger Cavazos writes “Both Japan and North Korea are presently taking concrete steps, and responding primarily to their own perceived national interest. The path to redemption is rarely linear and never easy. North Korea’s tentative reaching out should be met with reversible actions and Japan’s bold steps should be encouraged – maybe even followed.”
Roger Cavazos is a Nautilus Institute Associate and retired US military intelligence officer.
The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Nautilus Institute. Readers should note that Nautilus seeks a diversity of views and opinions on significant topics in order to identify common ground.
II. POLICY FORUM BY Roger cavazos
Rising Sun, Morning Calm, Redeeming Step
There existed a tone deaf Japanese leader with an alternate view of history. There also existed a North Korean leader skilled in the dark arts of increasing tensions only to decrease them while asymptotically approaching red lines. Surely a pair of leaders like that can’t possibly have productive discussions. But they did. Junichiro Koizumi and Kim Jong-il met one summer day in 2002 just before the autumnal equinox a symbolic 50-50 mix of light and dark. It was the closest the two countries came to normalizing relations. Both countries missed important steps on the road to their own normalization.
Japan habitually feels left out. Most recently, they were not invited to a conference their friends are planning to hold. Historical issues run deep and how Japan deals with them are a core part of several relationships in the region. Deeply engrained historical animosities in the region pre-date World War II and likely will not be resolved soon, but there certainly are ways to prevent animosities from being stirred up and revisited on a regular basis. Japan could use a little redemption to show Asia they are a normal power, able to exercise all levers of national power in a positive way.
A classic path to redemption is dealing with those outside the mainstream. North Korea must be keenly aware that simply talking with Japan has a strong potential to sow discord between Japan and others in the region. But so far the delicate subject has been handled in a way that demonstrates talking with North Korea is not the same as rewarding North Korea. Talking with North Korea is in Japan’s self-interest as Japan seeks to account for its citizens and increase stability in the region. Surely a normal, and redeemed, country values the life of each of its citizens.
North Korea has a new leader who has been busy securing his role. By most accounts and interpretations, he is now in control. At the risk of infantilizing some aspects of his behavior, he “banged his spoon” and did not receive anything since there was nothing external that was more valuable to him than securing his internal domestic rule.
Kim Jong-un’s indelible marks upon the country so far are martial: a nuclear bomb that functions in pristine laboratory conditions and a rocket. The North Korean people still engage in routine “belt-tightening”. No one knows exactly how many are starving in North Korea, but ending an “arduous march” and arriving at paradise or as Kim Il-sung envisioned it in January of 1961 as a place to “…eat rice and meat soup, wear fine clothes and live in tiled-roof houses” would go a long way in redeeming three generations of Kim leadership.
South Korea received a broad range of aid when normalizing relations with Japan. North Korea is almost certainly counting on a similar package of aid, assistance, and international good will if they normalize relations with Japan. Admittedly, it’s a long shot, but it may be just the kind of Deus Ex Machina solution North Korea needs to realize the “6.28 policy” of remodeling the industrial and agricultural sector – in short, economic reform with North Korean characteristics.
Neither Shinzo Abe nor Kim Jong-un have to break much new ground. The outline and roadmap were set out by two leaders who were secure in their position, all it takes now is updating the roadmap and following through on the outline. There are few downsides for the rest of the world to bringing North Korea more thoroughly into the international system. Kim Jong-un will have to assess for himself whether the positives of normalization outweigh the negatives of remaining isolated.
Both Japan and North Korea are presently taking concrete steps, and responding primarily to their own perceived national interest. The path to redemption is rarely linear and never easy. North Korea’s tentative reaching out should be met with reversible actions and Japan’s bold steps should be encouraged – maybe even followed.
III. NAUTILUS INVITES YOUR RESPONSES
The Nautilus Peace and Security Network invites your responses to this report. Please leave a comment below or send your response to: firstname.lastname@example.org. Comments will only be posted if they include the author’s name and affiliation.
just so you understand, that while they are singing for japan, what you dont know is what they are actually saying unless you can read korean. the north korean children are taught from birth that japan and america are the 2 worst enemies of north korea. so they are most likely singing about how japan deserved it. if not its a media stunt but you should still read up on what those children are taught in school. then you can voice a sympathetic opinion.
Matilda – 의견을 주셔서 감사합니다! Thanks for engaging and sharing. You raise a very good point. Do you know where I can get a copy of North Korea’s curriculum?
Everyone takes it on faith that North Korea indoctrinates their folks from an early age. I primarily read Korean docs through the Chinese press. But as soon as you raised the point, I realized I’ve never actually read North Korea’s detailed curriculum in either English, Chinese or Korean.
Indoctrination in schools is reversible…. Granted it will take a few generations to do so, but there is nothing (as far as I’m aware of) that makes North Korean genetically pre-disposed to hate – or love – anything, in particular.