NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, November 30, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, November 30, 2005 I. NAPSNet 1. Six Party Talks 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Program 3. Inter-Korean Relations 4. DPRK Human Rights 5. DPRK Economy 6. DPRK Leadership 7. DPRK Telecommunications 8. US on DPRK Counterfeiting 9. ROK on Yasukuni Issue 10. Japan on […]
Archives
Policy Forum 05-95A: The Cabal is Alive and Well
Leon V. Sigal, director of the Northeast Cooperative Security Project at the Social Science Research Council in New York and author of “Disarming Strangers: Nuclear Diplomacy with North Korea“, writes. “That leaves little choice for Hill but to go for an initial declaration — a form of words for words. Although Hill sees that as part of negotiating process in which any omissions can be cleared up, hard-liners will surely use it to play gotcha, insisting that any omissions are conclusive evidence of North Korean cheating and grounds for breaking off talks.”
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, November 29, 2005
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, November 29, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, November 29, 2005 I. NAPSNet 1. DPRK-Iran Relations 2. Inter-Korean Relations 3. DPRK-US Relations 4. DPRK-Russian Relations 5. USDA on DPRK Food Production 6. DPRK Human Rights 7. ROK on DPRK Electricity Supply 8. DPRK Adbuctees 9. PRC Religious Policy 10. PRC Mine Blast […]
NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, November 28, 2005
NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, November 28, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, November 28, 2005 I. NAPSNet 1. KEDO Project 2. DPRK Nuclear Program 3. Inter-Korean Relations 4. Inter-Korean Family Reunions 5. DPRK-US Relations 6. DPRK-Japanese Relations 7. NIS on DPRK-PRC Relations 8. DPRK Human Rights 9. DPRK Food Shortage 10. DPRK Economic Issues 11. DPRK […]
NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, November 23, 2005
NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, November 23, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, November 23, 2005 I. NAPSNet 1. KEDO Project 2. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation 3. Inter-Korean Athletic Cooperation 4. DPRK Leadership 5. Expert on DPRK Leadership 6. DPRK Human Rights 7. DPRK Refugees 8. Food Aid to DPRK Preceding NAPSNet Report I. NAPSNet 1. KEDO Project […]
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, November 22, 2005
NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, November 22, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, November 22, 2005 I. NAPSNet 1. Iranian Exile on DPRK Nuclear Program 2. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation 3. Inter-Korean Relations 4. Inter-Korean Family Reunions 5. DPRK Human Rights 6. DPRK Defectors 7. Aid to DPRK 8. DPRK Bird Flu 9. Japan on Government Reform 10. […]
Response to “Made in Which Korea?”
Response to “Made in Which Korea?” Response to “Made in Which Korea?” Discussion of Policy Forum Online 05-94A: November 21st, 2005 Response to “Made in Which Korea?” by Andrei Lankov CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Comments by Pilho Park on “Made in which Korea?” III. Nautilus invites your responses Go to “Made in which Korea?” (November […]
Policy Forum 05-94A: Made in Which Korea?
The JoongAng Daily News ran this editorial on the challenges of inter-Korean economic cooperation and the Kaesong Industrial Complex. “The economic benefit for both Koreas is estimated to exceed $20 billion a year. Unification Minister Chung Dong-young has spoken of the need to amend the South Korean constitution to recognize North Korean territory. It would be hard to declare the products from Kaesong as goods that are made in South Korea after such an amendment.”
Go to the discussion.
NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, November 21, 2005
NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, November 21, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Monday, November 21, 2005 I. NAPSNet 1. APEC on DPRK Nuclear Program 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Program 3. US, PRC on DPRK Nuclear Program 4. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation 5. DPRK-US Relations 6. Aid to DPRK 7. Expert on Aid to DPRK 8. DPRK Human […]
Policy Forum 05-93A: The United States and South Korea: Can This Alliance Last?
Don Oberdorfer, Distinguished Journalist in Residence and adjunct professor of international relations at the Johns Hopkins University’s Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, wrote: “Despite distrust on the part of some of their superiors in both capitals, these people will tell you, as they have told me, that they have worked well with one another in common purposes in the Six Party Talks, bilateral talks about the U.S. military deployments in Korea and in other instances. To sum up, I believe the U.S.-R.O.K. alliance is in trouble but that it will continue, at least for a while, depending in large part on choices that Koreans decide to make.”