NAPSNet Daily Report 08 April, 2003

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. DPRK Pakistan Missile Export?
2. ROK Stance on DPRK Missile Firing
3. ROK Parliament on US-Led War on Iraq
4. US Stealth Fighter Jets in ROK
5. Japan on Korean Peninsula
6. Japan on US-Led War on Iraq
8. Asia Response to SARS
9. PRC Response to Human Rights Report
10. Philippines on DPRK Impact on Regional Stability
11. DPRK Human Rights
12. US ROK Troop Realignment
13. KCNA on US Human Rights Report
II. Republic of Korea 1. Sending ROK Troops to Iraq?
2. Longer Station of US Forces for Drill
3. EUCCK toward DPRK for Investment
4. Human Rights Report on Two Koreas
III. CanKor E-Clipping 1. Issue #119

NAPSNet Daily Report 07 April, 2003

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. DPRK-ROK Ministerial Talks Cancellation
2. DPRK on UN Resolutions
3. DPRK on US Attack
4. SARS Global Fatalities
5. PRC Response to SARS Scare
6. Japan Radicals US Base attack
7. DPRK Radio Broadcasts
8. Japan Human Shields in Iraq
II. People’s Republic of China 1. The DPRK Nuke Issue
2. Shanghai Co-operation Organization
3. US-Russian Ties
4. ROK-US Relations
5. PRC’s Disarmament Scheme
6. PRC-US Relations
7. Japan-PRC Relations
8. Russia-PRC Relations
III. Republic of Korea 1. Cancellation of Inter Korean Ministerial Talks
2. Three DPRK Defectors to ROK on Boat
3. ROK-US Cooperative Diplomacy on DPRK
4. DPRK Nuclear Issue to UN
5. USFK Downsizing and Relocation in Seoul
IV. Japan 1. Japan’s Role in Iraq War
2. Japanese Logistic Support for US
3. Japan’s Plutonium Storage
4. Japan Domestic Politics

NAPSNET Week in Review 4 April, 2003

Korean Peninsula 1. ROK Parliament on US-Led War on Iraq The ROK National Assembly has approved a government proposal to send 700 non-combatant troops to support the US-led war on Iraq. The vote was a victory for President Roh Moo-hyun, who had told parliament that the deployment was essential for pragmatic reasons. He said sending […]

Policy Forum 03-27A: Double Trouble?

William Potter, director of the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies and Phillip Saunders, director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies, argue that given the current war in Iraq, North Korean efforts to potentially escalate the crisis carry a high risk of misperception and unintended consequences. The potential for major miscalculations by both the United States and the DPRK is compounded by lack of agreement in Washington about what the United States seeks from North Korea and what it should be prepared to pay. The administration’s failure to draw “red lines” about proscribed behavior means that North Korea can only guess what actions might prompt a forceful U.S. response.

NAPSNet Daily Report 04 April, 2003

 
CONTENTS

I. United States

1. DPRK on US-Led War on Iraq
2. DPRK Leader Re-appearence
4. PRC on DPRK Dialogue
5. US-ROK Relations
6. US Japan Minesweeper Calls
7. PRC SARS Virus
8. ROK SARS Alert
9. Japan-PRC Relations
10. ROK Domestic Economy
11. DPRK on US Human Rights
12. DPRK on US-ROK Joint Military Exercise
II. Republic of Korea 1. Deploying ROK Army to Iraq War
2. DPRK Missile Test Issue
3. DPRK Nuclear Agenda to UN
4. ROK Economy Depending on DPRK
5. ROK-US Talks on Military Alliance

Policy Forum 03-26A: The Role of Economic Leverage in Negotiations with North Korea

In this essay, Kimberly Ann Elliott, Research Fellow at the Institute for International Economics in Washington, D.C. outlines the strategy and potential efficacy of economic sanctions on North Korea. Consequently, Elliott concludes, multilateral cooperation and negotiation are critical to peacefully resolving the current nuclear crisis on the Korean peninsula. While North Korea’s closest neighbors are again resisting the sanctions option, if economic sanctions were part of a carrots and stick strategy to negotiate a resolution to the crisis, they might choose to cooperate-especially if the principal alternatives are continued instability or a military strike.

NAPSNET Week in Review 31 March, 2003

United States 1. US on DPRK-ROK Talk Cancellations The US said it regretted the DPRK’s decision to cancel talks this week with the ROK, describing them as a useful. The DPRK suspended the economic and maritime talks on Saturday, billing the move as retaliation for what it said was the ROK’s high military state of […]

Policy Forum 03-25A: Crisis in North Korea: the U.S. Strategic Future in East Asia

The following is text of a speech given on March 20, 2003 by Desaix Anderson at the Croft Institute of International Studies University of Mississippi Oxford. Anderson asserts that success through bi-lateral negotiations between the United States and North Korea was attainable last fall and might still be attainable if our diplomacy were flexible and deft. But time has become very short and it may already be too late. We may now be faced with only two options: catastrophic war or a nuclear-armed North Korea. Desaix Anderson served for thirty-five year as a Foreign Service Officer, U.S. State Department, working in and on Asian issues, was Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and the Pacific (1989-92) and executive director of the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO) for over three years until April 2001. He currently writes on Asian issues and paints in New York City.