Policy Forum 05-18A: Reading North Korean Ruins

Dr. Soyoung Kwon, post-doctorate fellow at the Asia-Pacific Research Centre of Stanford University, and Glyn Ford, member of the Korean Peninsula Delegation in the European Parliament, write: “Security and the economy are North Korea’s two top priorities. All of which seems to indicate that Kim Jong Il is firmly behind and committed to the economic reform process. For those who favor a changing regime rather than regime change the message is clear. Now is the time to engage.”

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, February 24, 2005

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, February 24, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, February 24, 2005 I. United States 1. DPRK on Nuclear Talks 2. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Talks 3. US, ROK, Japan on DPRK Nuclear Talks 4. Japan on DPRK Nuclear Talks 5. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Issue 6. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Issue 7. […]

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, February 23, 2005

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, February 23, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, February 23, 2005 I. United States 1. US, ROK, Japan on DPRK Nuclear Talks 2. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Talks 3. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks 4. US, PRC on DPRK Nuclear Talks 5. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Talks 6. US on DPRK Nuclear […]

Policy Forum 05-17A: Pyongyang Raises the Stakes

Ralph A. Cossa, president of the Pacific Forum CSIS, a Honolulu-based non-profit research institute affiliated with the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, writes: “North Korea has effectively played a ‘divide and conquer’ game throughout the nuclear stand-off. If it receives conflicting signals from Washington, Seoul, Beijing, Tokyo, and Moscow in the face of this latest provocation, it will be encouraged to continue this tactic. The time has come for the other five finally to begin speaking with one voice to Pyongyang, to hold it accountable for its own words and actions.”

Go to the discussion.

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, February 22, 2005

NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, February 22, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Tuesday, February 22, 2005 I. United States 1. DPRK on Nuclear Talks 2. DPRK on DPRK-US Relations 3. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Talks 4. US – PRC on DPRK Nuclear Issue 5. US – Japan on DPRK Nuclear Issue 6. Japan on DPRK Nuclear Talks […]

Policy Forum 05-16A: The Six-Party Failure

Aidan Foster-Carter, honorary senior research fellow in sociology and modern Korea at Leeds University, writes: “the Dear Leader has trouble at home too. Six-party fixations have also distracted us from internal North Korean politics: a murky area, but one where hidden eruptions begin to ruffle the bland theatrical veneer. Last year Kim purged his brother-in-law and ex-right-hand man Chang Song-taek. Three sons vie to be dauphin, with rumors of murder plots (in Vienna, even). This struggle may be over policy – hawks versus doves – or simply power. Either way, stability can no longer be taken for granted.”

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, February 17, 2005

NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, February 17, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Thursday, February 17, 2005 I. United States 1. US on DPRK Nuclear Program 2. Japan on DPRK Nuclear Program 3. DPRK on Nuclear Program 4. US on DPRK Nuclear Issue 5. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Issue 6. ROK on US Role in DPRK Nuclear Issue […]

Policy Forum 05-15A: Caught in the Muddle-Round Two of Bush vs. North Korea

John Feffer, author of “North Korea, South Korea: U.S. Policy at a Time of Crisis“, writes: “The new team at the State Department should consider how a more flexible U.S. negotiating position which would deal with the plutonium program first and provide incentives throughout the dismantlement process rather than just at the end could solve one of the world’s most pressing problems and, improbable as it might seem at the moment, provide George W. Bush with a positive legacy when he retires.”

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, February 16, 2005

NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, February 16, 2005 NAPSNet Daily Report Wednesday, February 16, 2005 I. United States 1. US on DPRK Nuclear Issue 2. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Issue 3. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Issue 4. Japan on DPRK Nuclear Issue 5. DPRK on Nuclear Issue 6. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks 7. ROK on […]

Policy Forum 05-14A: North Korea’s Tactics

Leon V. Sigal, director of the Northeast Cooperative Security Project at the Social Science Research Council in New York and author of “Disarming Strangers: Nuclear Diplomacy with North Korea“, writes: “North Korea is the embodiment of evil to some Americans, who object to making a pact with the devil. Why they prefer to bluff and bluster while watching North Korea adds to its nuclear might instead of disarming it through give-and-take is a mystery of their faith.”