- I. NAPSNet
- 1. US on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 2. US-PRC Cooperation on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 3. US-Japan on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 4. Israel on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 5. US-DPRK Cultural Exchanges
- 6. DPRK-Russian Relations
- 7. ROK on Proliferation Security Initiative
- 8. US-ROK Security Alliance
- 9. Japan Maritime Incident
- 10. US-Japan Relations
- 11. Sino-Japanese Military Relations
- 12. Sino-US Military Relations
- 13. Sino-Indian Territorial Dispute
- 14. Cross Strait Relations
- 15. PRC Environment
Archives
A Maritime Security Regime for Northeast Asia: Part I
By Mark J. Valencia Policy Forum Online 08-017A: February 27th, 2008 I. Introduction Mark J. Valencia, Nautilus Institute Senior Associate and Visiting Senior Fellow at the Maritime Institute of Malaysia, writes, “there is a growing consensus that it is not too early to begin discussing a security architecture in Northeast Asia. That discussion should begin […]
Policy Forum 08-017: A Maritime Security Regime for Northeast Asia: Part I
Mark J. Valencia, a maritime security analyst in Kaneohe, Hawaii, writes “emerging from one of the most conflict prone regions of the world is a conflict avoidance regime – in short, an expectation of self-restraint and sharing in such situations. But these regimes are not multilateral nor have they evolved in that direction despite the hopes and recommendations of policy analysts and practitioners. Nevertheless, they can be expanded and have a spillover effect on relations in general and maritime regime creation in particular.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 27 February, 2008
- I. NAPSNet
- 1. US on Six Party Talks
- 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 3. US-DPRK Cultural Exchange
- 4. US, PRC on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 5. Japan, ROK on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 6. Inter-Korean Relations
- 7. Religion in the DPRK
- 8. US-ROK Trade Relations
- 9. Sino-Indian Relations
- 10. Sino-US Relations
- 11. Cross Strait Relations
- 12. PRC Energy
- 13. PRC Environment
NAPSNet Daily Report 26 February, 2008
- I. NAPSNet
- 1. US Fuel Shipments to the DPRK
- 2. DPRK on Fuel Shipments
- 3. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 4. US on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 5. US-DPRK Cultural Exchanges
- 6. DPRK-Russian Relations
- 7. DPRK Economy
- 8. US-ROK Security Alliance
- 9. US-Japan-PRC Military Relations
- 10. Sino-Japanese Relations
- 11. Japan Maritime Incident
- 12. Japan-Australia Trade Relations
- 13. Sino-US Military Relations
- 14. Sino-Indian Military Exercise
- 15. Cross Strait Relations
- 16. PRC AIDS Issue
Policy Forum 08-016: Presidential Elections and the Future of Russian-Korean Relations
Leonid Petrov, Research Associate in the Division of Pacific and Asian History at Australian National University, writes, “If Moscow, Pyongyang and Seoul reach a mutual understanding, coordinate their policies, and preclude their rivals from destroying this unity, many hopes of the Russian and Korean peoples have a good chance of materializing in the coming four to five years.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 25 February, 2008
- I. Napsnet
- 1. DPRK Nuclear Program
- 2. US on Six Party Talks
- 3. US and ROK on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 4. DPRK on US-ROK Exercises
- 5. US-DPRK Cultural Exchanges
- 6. DPRK Refugees
- 7. DPRK Resource Development
- 8. ROK Foreign Policy
- 9. US-ROK Policy Coordination
- 10. US-ROK Relations
- 11. ROK Diplomacy
- 12. ROK-Japan Relations
- 13. Sino-Japanese Territorial Dispute
- 14. PRC Human Rights
NAPSNet Daily Report 22 February, 2008
- I. NAPSNet
- 1. US on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 2. DPRK on Nuclear Program
- 3. Six Party Talks Energy Working Group
- 4. DPRK Military Exercises
- 5. DPRK on Japan Missile Defense Program
- 6. DPRK Human Rights
- 7. DPRK Corruption
- 8. ROK POWs in DPRK
- 9. US-DPRK Cultural Exchanges
- 10. ROK Military Procurements
- 11. ROK Politics
- 12. ROK-Japan FTA
- 13. Japan SDF Indian Ocean Mission
- 14. US-Japan Relations
- 15. Japanese Defense Ministry
- 16. Sino-Japanese Relations
- 17. Russia, India, PRC Relations
- 18. Sino-US Military Relations
- 19. PRC on US Satelite Shootdown
- 20. PRC Rural Economy
- 21. PRC Bird Flu Outbreak
- 22. PRC Energy Supply
Policy Forum 08-015: Hardliners Target Détente with North Korea
Suzy Kim, former international secretary of MINKAHYUP Human Rights Group in Seoul, Korea, and a visiting assistant professor of East Asian Studies at Oberlin College, and John Feffer, co-director of Foreign Policy In Focus at the Institute for Policy Studies, write, “What’s at stake is an end to more than half a century of hostilities in U.S.-North Korea relations, 20 million North Korean lives, and a peaceful and prosperous East Asia. The United States has to commit to the long haul. It’s time to give engaged diplomacy a chance.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 21 February, 2008
- I. NAPSNet
- 1. US-ROK Joint Military Exercise
- 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 3. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 4. ROK Policy Toward the DPRK
- 5. ASEAN-DPRK Relations
- 6. US-DPRK Artistic Exchange
- 7. US-ROK Trade Relations
- 8. ROK-Japan Relations
- 9. ROK, Japan Defense Programs
- 10. Sino-Japanese Territorial Dispute
- 11. Sino-Indian Trade Relations
- 12. PRC Afircan Diplomacy
- 13. PRC Olympics
- 14. PRC Environment
- 15. PRC Energy Supply