- I. NAPSNet
- 1. Six Party Talks
- 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 3. DPRK on Nuclear Program
- 4. ROK on DPRK Energy Aid
- 5. US-DPRK Relations
- 6. Sino-DPRK Relations
- 7. Mt. Kumgang Shooting
- 8. DPRK Economy
- 9. DPRK Food Supply
- 10. DPRK-ASEAN Relations
- 11. DPRK Cultural Exchanges
- 12. US-ROK Trade Relations
- 13. ROK-Japan Territorial Dispute
- 14. Japan Missile Defense
- 15. Japanese Nuclear Energy
- 16. Cross Strait Relations
- 17. US-PRC Relations
- 18. PRC Leadership
Archives
Policy Forum 08-053: Securing the Sulu Sea
Mark J. Valencia, a Maritime Policy Analyst and a Nautilus Institute Senior Associate, writes, “the littoral states of the Sulu Sea need to gain the “confidence” of the United States that they can – with capacity building and the right equipment – handle the problem themselves. The first steps would be to agree to co-ordinated patrols, ‘hand-off’ hot pursuit, and an ‘eye in the sky’ arrangement.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 10 July, 2008
- I. NAPSNet
- 1. Six-Party Talks
- 2. DPRK on Six Party Talks
- 3. Inter-Korean Relations
- 4. US on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 5. Russian Energy Aid to the DPRK
- 6. Russian Food Aid to the DPRK
- 7. Japan on DPRK Sanctions
- 8. Russo-Japanese Relations
- 9. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 10. US-ROK Relations
- 11. US-ROK Trade Relations
- 12. ROK, Japan, PRC Environmental Cooperation
- 13. ROK-Indian Trade Relations
- 14. Japan-ROK Territorial Dispute
- 15. Japan-Australia Non-Proliferation Efforts
- 16. PRC Security
NAPSNet Daily Report 9 July, 2008
- I. NAPSNet
- 1. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 3. Inter-Korean Relations
- 4. ROK Aid to the DPRK
- 5. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 6. DPRK on Non-Aligned Movement
- 7. Japan on Nuclear Weapons
- 8. Japan-ROK Territorial Dispute
- 9. Russo-Japanese Territorial Dispute
- 10. Sino-Japanese Relations
- 11. PRC Earthquake
- 12. PRC Environment
Policy Forum 08-052: Denuclearization and Peace Regime on the Korean Peninsula are Possible
Wooksik Cheong, representative of Peace Network Korea, writes, “Eventually, ‘practically complete denuclearization’ requires Bush’s determination as much as Kim Jong-il’s. Particularly, a DPRK-U.S. Summit is essential for a final agreement between the two nations. The most practical and symbolic way to show the end of hostile relations between the U.S. and DPRK is to create a scene of a firm handshake between Bush and Kim.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 8 July, 2008
- I. NAPSNet
- 1. Six-Party Talks
- 2. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 3. PRC on DPRK Sanctions
- 4. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 5. DPRK Economy
- 6. DPRK Cultural Exchanges
- 7. Japan Naval Power
- 8. Sino-Japanese Relations
- 9. Sino-Russian Territorial Dispute
- 10. Cross Strait Relations
- 11. PRC Environment
- 12. PRC Media Control
- 13. Mongolia Elections
NAPSNet Daily Report 7 July, 2008
- I. Napsnet
- 1. Six-Party Talks
- 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 3. DPRK-Pakistan Nuclear Cooperation
- 4. Japanese Abductees Issue
- 5. Inter-Korea Relations
- 6. Separated Families
- 7. Korean War Killings
- 8. ROK Military Exercises
- 9. ROK Military Reform
- 10. US-ROK Trade Relations
- 11. ROK Cabinet Reshuffle
- 12. Sino-Japanese Relations
- 13. Cross Strait Relations
NAPSNet Daily Report 4 July, 2008
- I. NAPSNet
- 1. DPRK Nuclear Declaration
- 2. DPRK Nuclear Program
- 3. DPRK Nuclear Dismantlement
- 4. US on DPRK Terror List Status
- 5. US Policy on the DPRK
- 6. DPRK-Pakistan Nuclear Cooperation
- 7. Russia on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 8. Abductee Issue
- 9. DPRK Human Rights
- 10. DPRK Economy
- 11. Sino-ROK Relations
- 12. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 13. DPRK Defectors
- 14. Russo-Japanese Territorial Dispute
- 15. Japan Whaling Issue
- 16. Cross Strait Relations
- 17. Sino-Indian Relations
- 18. Sino-Russian Energy Trade
- 19. Tibet Issue
- 20. PRC Food Supply
- 21. PRC Internet Use
- 22. PRC Olympic Security
- 23. Mongolia Elections
Policy Forum 08-051: Caution Against Overestimating Pyongyang’s Move
Andrei Lankov, an Associate Professor at Kookmin University, Seoul, and Adjunct Research Fellow at the Research School of Pacifica and Asian Studies, Australian National University, writes, “The efforts of the negotiators are not likely to produce the ideal outcome, that is, complete and verifiable destruction of all North Korean nuclear weapons. Nonetheless, it is possible to achieve the compromise, which will make the further increase of the North Korean nuclear arsenal difficult.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 3 July, 2008
- I. NAPSNet