Emma Chanlett-Avery, Specialist in Asian Affairs, and Mary Beth Nikitin, Analyst in Nonproliferation, write, “Japanese officials and experts remain remarkably uniform in their consensus that Japan is unlikely to move toward nuclear status in the short-to-medium term. However, as the security environment has shifted significantly, the topic is no longer toxic and has been broached by several leading politicians.”
Archives
NAPSNet Daily Report 25 March, 2009
- 1. US on DPRK Missile Program
- 2. ROK, PRC on DPRK Missile Program
- 3. EU on DPRK Missile Program
- 4. DPRK Detention of Journalists
- 5. US Policy Toward DPRK
- 6. US Food Aid for DPRK
- 7. DPRK Defectors
- 8. ROK-Indonesian Military Relations
- 9. ROK Military
- 10. ROK Climate Change
- 11. ROK Demographics
- 12. Japanese Politics
- 13. Japan Energy
- 14. Japanese Environment
- 15. Japanese A-Bomb Victims
- 16. PRC Tibet Issue
- 17. PRC Unrest
- 18. PRC Energy
- 19. PRC on Monetary Policy
Policy Forum 09-023: The Role of the Military in the Fall of the Ceausescu Regime and The Possible Relevance for a Post-Kim Jong-il Transition in North Korea
Greg Scarlatoiu, Director of Public Affairs and Business Issues of the Korea Economic Institute, writes, “Dissent at the top or within the military ranks may seem unlikely for as long as Kim Jong-il is in power, given the authority he seems to wield, in particular after the establishment of the military first policy after his father’s death. However, previous reports of a couple of failed attempted coups in the early to mid-1990s indicate that the North Korean military has not always thought favorably of hereditary succession. In a post-Kim Jong-il scenario, developments may unravel in a way reminiscent of Romania 1989.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 24 March, 2009
- 1. DPRK Missile Program
- 2. US on DPRK Missile Program
- 3. DPRK on Six Party Talks
- 4. ROK on Japan Role in Six-Party Talks
- 5. DPRK Detention of Journalists
- 6. ROK Policy Toward DPRK
- 7. ROK Aid for DPRK
- 8. DPRK Government
- 9. DPRK Leadership
- 10. ROK Military
- 11. ROK-EU Trade Relations
- 12. Japan Missile Defense
- 13. Japanese Politics
- 14. Japanese Demographics
- 15. Sino-US Relations
- 16. Cross Strait Economic Relations
- 17. PRC Tibet Issue
- 18. PRC Unrest
- 19. PRC Climate Change
- 20. PRC Environment
- 21. PRC on Monetary Policy
- 22. PRC Public Health
- 23. PRC Internet
NAPSNet Daily Report 23 March, 2009
- 1. DPRK Missile Program
- 2. US on DPRK Missile Program
- 3. Japanese Sanctions on DPRK
- 4. US-DPRK Relations
- 5. DPRK Detention of Journalists
- 6. Inter-Korea Relations
- 7. DPRK Leadership
- 8. DPRK Food Aid
- 9. DPRK Defectors
- 10. DPRK Economy
- 11. ROK Participation in PSI
- 12. ROK Diplomacy
- 13. ROK Anti-Terrorism
- 14. ROK-EU Trade Relations
- 15. Japanese Politics
- 16. Japanese Environment
- 17. PRC Military
- 18. PRC Space Program
- 19. PRC Tibet Issue
- 20. PRC Food Safety
NAPSNet Daily Report 20 March, 2009
- 1. US on DPRK Missile Program
- 2. Japan on DPRK Missile Program
- 3. PRC on Six Party Talks
- 4. Inter-Korean Military Relations
- 5. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 6. ROK on PSI Role
- 7. ROK on DPRK Human Rights
- 8. DPRK Leadership
- 9. DPRK Economy
- 10. Russo-Japanese Nuclear Cooperation
- 11. Japan-Vietnam Energy Cooperation
- 12. Sino-US Naval Relations
- 13. Sino-US Relations
- 14. Sino-Indian Trade Relations
- 15. Cross Strait Relations
- 16. PRC on Climate Change
- 17. PRC Economy
- 18. PRC Security
Policy Forum 09-022: Can We Reach a Nuclear Deal with North Korea?
Peter M. Beck, is a Professor at American University in Washington, D.C. and Ewha Womans University in Seoul, writes, “Working closely with Seoul, Washington must make an irresistible offer – normalization, completion of the two light water reactors scrapped by Bush and economic assistance. A ‘shotgun wedding’ may just be the most effective way of testing the North’s intentions. However, there’s one catch. We must be prepared for a possible rejection by the North. In which case, we must be prepared to use the shotgun.”
Read a discussion of this article here.
NAPSNet Daily Report 19 March, 2009
- 1. DPRK Nuclear Program
- 2. DPRK on Six Party Talks
- 3. Japan on DPRK Missile Test
- 4. UK on DPRK Missile Test
- 5. US Missile Defense Program
- 6. US Journalists Detained in the DPRK
- 7. Sino-DPRK Relations
- 8. US-ROK Joint Military Exercise
- 9. DPRK Leadership
- 10. ROK Defense
- 11. ROK Disaster Relief Operations
- 12. US-ROK Security Alliance
- 13. ROK-Vietnam relations
- 14. Japan SDF Anti-Piracy Operations
- 15. Japan Energy Supply
- 16. Japan-ASEAN Relations
- 17. Cross-Straits Relations
- 18. PRC-Philippines Territorial Dispute
- 19. Sino-Russian Trade Relations
NAPSNet Daily Report 18 March, 2009
- 1. DPRK Missile Program
- 2. ROK on DPRK Missile Program
- 3. DPRK Threat to ROK
- 4. Inter-Korean Relations
- 5. Inter-Korea Economic Cooperation
- 6. Russia on DPRK Missile Launch
- 7. Sino-DPRK Relations
- 8. Russo-DPRK Relations
- 9. US-DPRK Relations
- 10. DPRK Food Supply
- 11. US Military in ROK
- 12. Terrorist Attacks Against ROK
- 13. ROK on Japan Whaling Issue
- 14. Japan Politics
- 15. Japan Energy
- 16. Japan Nuclear Power
- 17. Sino-Japanese Relations
- 18. Cross Strait Relations
- 19. US on Cross Strait Relations
- 20. Sino-Australian Military Relations
- 21. PRC Security
- 22. PRC Protest
- 23. PRC Economy
Policy Forum 09-021: North Korea Watches Washington
Tong Kim, Adjunct professor at SAIS, a research professor with the Ilmin Institute of International Relations, and a visiting professor of the Graduate University of North Korean Studies, writes, “As the North Koreans rewrite their talking points for future meetings, it is important for them to refrain from creating new problems either by launching a missile or even a satellite at this point or by making new unreasonable demands. Now the ball is back in Pyongyang’s court to join international efforts to move the denuclearization process forward, and to seek its own interest of security assurance and economic development.”