- 1. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 2. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 3. Inter-Korean Relations
- 4. DPRK Military
- 5. DPRK Economy
- 6. ROK Swine Flu Outbreak
- 7. US-ROK Trade Relations
- 8. Japan on Nuclear Weapon Free Zone
- 9. Russo-Japanese Territorial Dispute
- 10. Japan Politics
- 11. Japan Swine Flu Outbreak
- 12. Japan Whaling Issue
- 13. Sino-Indian Relations
- 14. Sino-Russian Trade Relations
- 15. Cross Strait Relations
- 16. PRC Swine Flu Outbreak
- 17. PRC Unrest
- 18. PRC Climate Change
- 19. PRC Energy Supply
- 20. PRC Environment
Archives
NAPSNet Daily Report 21 May, 2009
- 1. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 2. US Sanctions on the DPRK
- 3. US on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 4. US-DPRK Relations
- 5. Inter Korean Relations
- 6. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 7. UNDP Operations in the DPRK
- 8. DPRK Leadership
- 9. US-Japan Relations
- 10. Japan Swine Flu Outbreak
- 11. PRC, Japan, ROK Trade Relations
- 12. Cross Strait Relations
- 13. US-PRC Climate Change Collaboration
- 14. PRC Climate Change
- 15. PRC Protest
- 16. PRC Economy and the Environment
- 17. PRC Environmental Regulations
- 18. PRC Energy Supply
- 19. SCO Disaster Relief Drill
- 20. Shanghai Cooperation Organization
Policy Forum 09-040: China Civil Society Report: Charitable Donation in China
Jia Xijin, Associate Professor at the NGO Research Center at Tsinghua University, and Zhao Yusi, Project Assistant of NGO Research Center at Tsinghua University, describe the increase in donations to NGOs and public charities in China after the snow storm and Wenchuan earthquake. They note trends on the source of these donations, the organizations receiving them, and the oversight and transparency involved in the donation process.
NAPSNet Daily Report 20 May, 2009
- 1. US on DPRK Missile Program
- 2. US-DPRK Relations
- 3. US on Detained Journalists
- 4. Inter-Korean Relations
- 5. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 6. DPRK Foreign Relations
- 7. ROK Swine Flu Outbreak
- 8. US-Japan Relations
- 9. Japan Aid to Pakistan
- 10. Japan Politics
- 11. Japan Nuclear Power
- 12. Japan Swine Flu Outbreak
- 13. Cross Strait Relations
- 14. Sino-Indian Territorial Dispute
- 15. PRC-Brazil Energy Cooperation
- 16. PRC Security
- 17. PRC Environment and Public Health
- 18. PRC Swine Flu Outbreak
- 19. PRC Avian Flu Issue
- 20. PRC Climate Change
NAPSNet Daily Report 19 May, 2009
- 1. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 2. US on DPRK Missile Program
- 3. US-DPRK Relations
- 4. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 5. Inter-Korean Relations
- 6. DPRK Economy
- 7. Sino-DPRK Trade Relations
- 8. DPRK Chemical Weapons
- 9. ROK Defense
- 10. ROK Navy
- 11. Japan SDF Anti-Piracy Operations
- 12. Japan Nuclear Power
- 13. Japan Climate Change
- 14. Japan Politics
- 15. Cross Strait Relations
- 16. Cross Strait Relations
- 17. Sino-Russian Energy Trade
- 18. PRC Military
- 19. PRC Swine Flu Issue
- 20. PRC Energy Supply
- 21. Civil Society in the PRC
- 22. East Asian Energy Cooperation
NAPSNet Daily Report 18 May, 2009
- 1. US-DPRK Relations
- 2. Inter-Korean Relations
- 3. Inter-Korea Economic Cooperation
- 4. DPRK Detention of Journalists
- 5. US-ROK Military Alliance
- 6. ROK Anti-Piracy Dispatch
- 7. Remains of ROK Soldiers from Korean War
- 8. ROK Climate Change
- 9. ROK Nuclear Energy
- 10. ROK Swine Flu
- 11. Sino-ROK Environmental Cooperation
- 12. Japan Pandemic Response
- 13. Japanese Politics
- 14. Sino-US Military Relations
- 15. Sino-US Relations
- 16. Cross-Strait Relations
NAPSNet Daily Report 15 May, 2009
- 1. US, Russia on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 2. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 3. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 4. Inter-Korean Relations
- 5. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 6. US-DPRK Relations
- 7. US on DPRK Missile Launch
- 8. Japan on DPRK Missile Launch
- 9. Sino-DPRK Trade
- 10. DPRK Economy
- 11. ROK PSI Role
- 12. ROK Anti-Piracy Operations
- 13. ROK Afghanistan Support
- 14. Japan Politics
- 15. Cross Strait Relations
- 16. Sino-US Relations
- 17. PRC on US Espionage Allegations
- 18. PRC Environment
- 19. PRC Environment and the Economy
- 20. PRC Energy Supply
Policy Forum 09-039: The New Korean Cold War and the Possibility of Thaw
Georgy Toloraya, Director of Korean Research Programs at the Institute of Economics at the Russian Academy of Science, writes, “First, a paradigm of US-DPRK coexistence has to be worked out based on the assumption that the Pyongyang regime is here to stay and should be recognized. A tacit understanding on the future of the DPRK and an easing of pressure on the country should be effected… This new approach should be seriously presented to North Korea by a communication at the highest level, without the demand for immediate ‘tit for tat’. Only after doing that could new arrangements for security on the Korean peninsula be discussed, with demilitarization and denuclearization remaining a vital but distant goal.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 14 May, 2009
- 1. DPRK Nuclear Program
- 2. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 3. Russia on DPRK Missile Program
- 4. Inter-Korean Relations
- 5. US-ROK Joint Evacuation Drill
- 6. ROK Cyberattacks
- 7. ROK-Australian Trade Relations
- 8. ROK Energy Supply
- 9. Russo-Japanese Territorial Dispute
- 10. Japan Economy
- 11. Japan Politics
- 12. USFJ Base Relocation
- 13. Japan Nuclear Safety
- 14. PRC Military
- 15. PRC Maritime Boundary
- 16. Sino-Russian Relations
- 17. PRC Port Investment
- 18. PRC Security
- 19. PRC Energy Supply
- 20. PRC Environment
- 21. PRC Climate Change
Policy Forum 09-038: A New U.S. Policy toward Korea: Korean American Recommendations for Real Change
John H. Kim, a Korean American attorney who served in the U.S. Army in South Korea, and Indong Oh, a Korean American Medical Doctor and co-chair of the June 15th Korean American Committee for Peace and Reunification of Korea, write, “As a candidate who got elected on a campaign promise of “change,” President Obama has a unique mandate and opportunity to shape a new U.S. policy toward Korea, including ending the long, costly Korean War finally and normalizing our relations with North Korea. However, it is not clear whether he recognizes the golden opportunity to bring a real change to the old, misguided U.S. policy toward Korea.”