Chaesung Chun, the Chair of the Asia Security Initiative at the East Asia Institute and an associate professor in the Department of International Relations at Seoul National University, recommends eight strategic principals for dealing with the DPRK nuclear issues including, “Search for new policy issues that will contribute to the project of ‘normalizing North Korea.’… We need to convince the North that the common goal of South Korea and the United States is to further the successful long-term future of North Korea, so long as it functions within global norms. Projects might focus on long-term policy areas such as education, infrastructure, and state finance.”
Archives
Policy Forum 09-046: Why Punishing North Korea Won’t Work… and What Will
Leon V. Sigal, Director of the Northeast Asia Cooperative Security Project at the Social Science Research Council, writes, “The only way to [test North Korea’s intentions] is to probe through sustained diplomatic give-and-take. That requires offering meaningful steps toward a new political, economic, and strategic relationship–including diplomatic recognition, a summit meeting, a peace treaty to end the Korean war, negative security assurances, and a multilateral pledge not to introduce nuclear weapons into the Korea Peninsula as well as other benefits to its security, agricultural and energy assistance, and conventional power plants if possible or nuclear power plants if necessary.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 10 June, 2009
- 1. Russia on DPRK Missile Program
- 2. US on DPRK Missile Program
- 3. DPRK on Nuclear Program
- 4. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Test
- 5. Sino-DPRK Relations
- 6. US on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 7. US on Detained Journalists
- 8. ROK Sanctions on the DPRK
- 9. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 10. Japan on DPRK Terror List Status
- 11. Japanese Sanctions on the DPRK
- 12. Japan Missile Defense
- 13. ROK Anti-Piracy Conference
- 14. ROK Politics
- 15. ROK Environment
- 16. Japan SDF
- 17. Japan-Pakistani Relations
- 18. Japan and IAEA Leadership
- 19. Japan Climate Change
- 20. Japan Swine Flu Outbreak
- 21. Sino-Japanese Relations
- 22. Sino-Indian Relations
- 23. Sino-French Relations
- 24. US-PRC Climate Change Collaboration
- 25. Cross Strait Relations
- 26. PRC Human Rights
- 27. US Aid to Mongolia
NAPSNet Daily Report 9 June, 2009
- 1. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 2. UN Sanctions on DPRK
- 3. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Test
- 4. US on DPRK Nuclear Test
- 5. US on Detained Journalists
- 6. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 7. Inter-Korean Relations
- 8. US-ROK Security Alliance
- 9. DPRK Leadership
- 10. ROK Politics
- 11. ROK Nuclear Exports
- 12. USFJ Base Relocation
- 13. Japan SDF
- 14. Japan Pandemic Response
- 15. Japan Politics
- 16. Sino-Japanese Economic Cooperation
- 17. Sino-Japanese Environmental Cooperation
- 18. Sino-Indian Relations
- 19. Sino-Russian Energy Trade
- 20. Cross Strait Relations
- 21. Sino-Vietnamese Territorial Dispute
- 22. US on PRC Human Rights
- 23. PRC Military
- 24. PRC Internet Control
- 25. PRC Environment
- 26. PRC Swine Flu Outbreak
NAPSNet Daily Report 8 June, 2009
- 1. UN on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 2. Japan on UN Sanctions
- 3. US on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 4. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 5. DPRK Missile Program
- 6. ROK on DPRK Missile Program
- 7. US on DPRK Terror List Status
- 8. DPRK Detention of Journalists
- 9. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 10. ROK Participation in PSI
- 11. DPRK on Suicide of Former ROK President
- 12. DPRK Leadership
- 13. US Nuclear Umbrella for ROK
- 14. ROK Influenza Outbreak
- 15. ROK Climate Change
- 16. ROK Environment
- 17. ROK Whaling
- 18. ROK Energy
- 19. Japanese Politics
- 20. Japanese Climate Change
- 21. Japanese Anti-Piracy Measures
- 22. Japanese Military Procurements
- 23. Russo-Japan Military Relations
- 24. Sino-Japanese Trade Relations
- 25. Sino-US Climate Change Response
- 26. Cross Strait Economic Relations
- 27. PRC Influenza Response
- 28. PRC Tibet Issue
- 29. PRC Foreign Aid
NAPSNet Daily Report 5 June, 2009
- 1. DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 3. US on DPRK Terror List Status
- 4. US Journalists Detained in the DPRK
- 5. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Test
- 6. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 7. Russia on DPRK Nuclear Test
- 8. Inter-Korean Maritime Incident
- 9. DPRK Leadership
- 10. DPRK Counterfeiting Operations
- 11. US-ROK Security Alliance
- 12. ROK Missile Defense
- 13. Japan Nuclear Power
- 14. Japan Energy Development
- 15. Japan Politics
- 16. Sino-Russian Environmental Cooperation
- 17. US-PRC Climate Change Collaboration
- 18. PRC-Iran Energy Cooperation
- 19. Cross Strait Relations
- 20. PRC Commemoration
- 21. PRC Military
- 22. PRC Security
- 23. PRC Development
- 24. PRC Energy Supply
NAPSNet Daily Report 4 June, 2009
- 1. DPRK Missile Program
- 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 3. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 4. US Military in the ROK
- 5. Russia on DPRK Nuclear Test
- 6. Sino-DPRK Relations
- 7. Inter-Korean Maritime Border
- 8. Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation
- 9. Inter-Korean Relations
- 10. DPRK Leadership
- 11. DPRK Aid
- 12. ROK-Vietnamese Energy Cooperation
- 13. US-Japan Security Alliance
- 14. Japan Space Program
- 15. Japan Politics
- 16. Japan Climate Change
- 17. Sino-Japanese Development Cooperation
- 18. Sino-Japanese Economic Relations
- 19. Cross Strait Relations
- 20. US on Cross Strait Relations
- 21. Sino-US Environmental Cooperation
- 22. US-PRC Relations
- 23. PRC Investments in Australia
- 24. PRC Protest
- 25. PRC Security
- 26. PRC Economy
- 27. PRC Energy Supply
- 28. PRC Environment
Policy Forum 09-045: Ramifications of the North Korean Nuclear Test
Emily B. Landau and Ephraim Asculai, Senior Research Fellows at the Institute for National Security Studies, write, “Without strong action on the part of the US, we might enter a new dynamic with parallel developments: nuclear proliferation that proceeds at an accelerated pace, together with inspiring but ineffective talk about (unheeded) international arms control treaties. So unless the US and its allies coordinate their moves, recognizing the acute seriousness of the North Korean nuclear challenge for both the immediate region and beyond, the situation will continue to deteriorate and could reach a dangerous point of no return.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 3 June, 2009
- 1. DPRK Leadership
- 2. DPRK Missile Launch
- 3. US on DPRK Missile Launch
- 4. Japan on UNSC Resolution
- 5. PRC, Russia on UNSC Resolution
- 6. PRC on UNSC Resolution
- 7. Inter-Korean Relations
- 8. ROK Military
- 9. US Military Deployment
- 10. Japan SDF
- 11. US Journalists Detained in the DPRK
- 12. DPRK Counterfeiting Operations
- 13. ROK Human Rights
- 14. ROK Space Program
- 15. Japan Constitutional Revision
- 16. Japan Politics
- 17. Japan Nuclear Power
- 18. Sino-Japanese Economic Relations
- 19. Sino-US Economic Relations
- 20. Sino-Indian Relations
- 21. Sino-Russian Environmental Cooperation
- 22. Cross Strait Relations
- 23. PRC Media Control
- 24. PRC Energy Supply
- 25. PRC Poverty
Policy Forum 09-044: Winning, not Playing the Nuclear Game with North Korea
Peter Hayes, Executive Director of the Nautilus Institute, and Scott Bruce, Director of the Institute’s San Francisco office, write, “it is time to win the game, not play it forever. This is within President Obama’s reach, but only if he rises above emotional and unrealistic talk of punishing North Korea and focuses on the big picture changes to the strategic landscape that would be necessary to strike a deal with Kim Jong Il worth having.”