- 1. DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 2. Inter-Korean Relations
- 3. Inter-Korean Relations
- 4. DPRK Defectors
- 5. ROK Defense
- 6. US-ROK Military Alliance
- 7. ROK Role in Afghanistan
- 8. US-Japan Extended Deterrence
- 9. US-Japan Nuclear Agreement
- 10. USFJ Base Relocation
- 11. Japanese Whaling
- 12. Japanese Politics
- 13. Taiwan Defense
- 14. PRC Cyber Hacking
Archives
NAPSNet Daily Report 19 February, 2010
- 1. DPRK on Nuclear Talks
- 2. DPRK Earthquake
- 3. Russia on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 4. US on DPRK Stability
- 5. DPRK Artillery Firings
- 6. ROK on Inter-Korea Relations
- 7. Inter-Korea Economic Cooperation
- 8. US-ROK Joint Military Exercise
- 9. ROK Military
- 10. ROK-EU Trade Relations
- 11. US-ROK Trade Relations
- 12. Japan-ROK Territorial Dispute
- 13. Japan Defense
- 14. USFJ Base Relocation
- 15. Japan Politics
- 16. Japan Whaling Issue
- 17. Sino-US Relations
- 18. Cross-Strait Relations
- 19. Sino-Indian Relations
- 20. PRC Nuclear Power
NAPSNet Daily Report 18 February, 2010
- 1. DPRK Nuclear Program
- 2. DPRK on Nuclear Talks
- 3. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 4. Inter-Korean Relations
- 5. US Food Aid to the DPRK
- 6. UN-DPRK Relations
- 7. DPRK Leadership
- 8. DPRK Economy
- 9. US-ROK Joint Military Exercise
- 10. US-ROK Missile Defense Cooperation
- 11. US-ROK Trade Relations
- 12. ROK, Japan, PRC Trade Relations
- 13. Japan-ROK Territorial Dispute
- 14. USFJ Base Relocation
- 15. Japan Energy Supply
- 16. Japan Environment
- 17. Japan Whaling Issue
- 18. Sino-US Relations
- 19. Cross-Strait Relations
- 20. PRC Tibet Issue
Policy Forum 10-013: We Need Both Hatoyama’s Decision and Obama’s Patience
Tsuneo “Nabe” Watanabe, Senior Fellow at the Tokyo Foundation, writes, “if mutual trust were created between the leaders of both sides, it would not be impossible to find solutions to overcome future troubles as well as the current impasse without damaging the alliance itself… The complex and difficult management of bases in Okinawa should not be a litmus test for support of the general Japan-US alliance.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 17 February, 2010
- 1. Inter-Korean Relations
- 2. ROK on DPRK Human Rights
- 3. DPRK Leadership
- 4. DPRK Diplomacy
- 5. DPRK Economy
- 6. US-ROK Relations
- 7. ROK PKO Haiti Dispatch
- 8. ROK-India Nuclear Cooperation
- 9. ROK Climate Change
- 10. USFJ Base Relocation
- 11. Japan Climate Change
- 12. ROK on Six-Party Talks
- 13. Cross-Strait Relations
- 14. Sino-Indian Relations
- 15. PRC Naval Strategy
- 16. PRC Climate Change
NAPSNet Daily Report 16 February, 2010
- 1. Sino-DPRK Relations
- 2. UN on DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 3. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 4. US-DPRK Relations
- 5. Inter-Korean Relations
- 6. DPRK Defection
- 7. DPRK Human Trafficking
- 8. DPRK Leadership
- 9. ROK, PRC, Japan Defense Talks
- 10. USFJ Base Relocation
- 11. Japan-Australia Security Relations
- 12. Japan-Australia on Nuclear Proliferation
- 13. Japanese Whaling
- 14. Sino-Australian Relations
- 15. Sino-Indian Relations
- 16. Cross-Strait Relations
- 17. PRC Security
Policy Forum 10-012: Peace Talks, Sanctions and Nuclear Negotiations: What the North is Really Saying
U.S.-Korea Institute at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) issued this analysis of the DPRK’s recent statements which notes, “By focusing on the dynamic as a cause of the problem rather than blaming the U.S. (or the ROK or Japan) as the culprit, Pyongyang has given itself room to consider a fairly broad range of options for moving the negotiating process ahead. Similarly noteworthy was the statement’s unusually balanced portrayal of the accomplishments of the Six Party Talks, citing examples of ways in which both sides gained. That allows the North to move forward in talks while maintaining its position that the way ahead rests on give or take or, more precisely, the principle of ‘action for action.’”
NAPSNet Daily Report 12 February, 2010
- 1. US-DPRK Relations
- 2. UN-DPRK Relations
- 3. ROK-Japan on DPRK Nuclear Issue
- 4. PRC on Six Party Talks
- 5. Inter-Korean Relations
- 6. ROK-DPRK-Russian Energy Cooperation
- 7. Thailand Seizure of DPRK Arms Shipment
- 8. DPRK Human Rights
- 9. DPRK Economy
- 10. US-ROK FTA
- 11. ROK-Uzbekistan Cooperation
- 12. ROK-Japan Relations
- 13. USFJ Base Relocation
- 14. Japan Politics
- 15. Japanese Whaling
- 16. Taiwan-Somali Piracy
- 17. Cross-Strait Relations
- 18. Sino-US Relations
- 19. Sino-Indian Relations
- 20. Sino-Japanese Relations
- 21. PRC Cybersecurity
- 22. PRC Security
- 23. PRC Climate Change
NAPSNet Daily Report 11 February, 2010
- 1. Sino-DPRK Relations
- 2. DPRK on Nuclear Talks
- 3. ROK on DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 4. US on DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 5. Inter-Korea Relations
- 6. DPRK Economy
- 7. US-ROK Security Alliance
- 8. ROK Military Procurements
- 9. ROK Afghanistan Dispatch
- 10. ROK-Turkey Nuclear Cooperation
- 11. Japan-US Security Alliance
- 12. Japan-US Relations
- 13. Japan Whaling Issue
- 14. Sino-ROK Relations
- 15. Sino-EU Relations
- 16. Sino-Australian Relations
- 17. PRC Civil Rights
- 18. PRC Human Rights
- 19. Taiwain Defense
NAPSNet Daily Report 10 February, 2010
- 1. DPRK on Nuclear Program
- 2. US on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 3. UN-DPRK Relations
- 4. DPRK Economy
- 5. DPRK Food Security
- 6. US-ROK Security Alliance
- 7. ROK Peacekeeping Operations
- 8. USFJ Base Relocation
- 9. US-Japan Security Alliance
- 10. Japan Politics
- 11. Japan Climate Change
- 12. Japan Energy Supply
- 13. Sino-Russian Energy Cooperation
- 14. Sino-US Espionage Allegations
- 15. Sino-Indian Relations
- 16. Taiwan Export Control
- 17. PRC Civil Society
- 18. PRC Military
- 19. PRC Energy Resources
- 20. PRC Environment