- 1. ROK Naval Ship Sinking
- 2. ROK Response to Naval Ship Sinking
- 3. US on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
- 4. UK on Naval Ship Probe
- 5. Japan, Australia on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
- 6. US-DPRK Relations
- 7. DPRK Economy
- 8. Inter-Korea Relations
- 9. Inter-Korean Economic Relations
- 10. US on ROK Defense
- 11. Japan-Australia Relations
- 12. Japan-US Military Relations
- 13. USFJ Base Relocation
- 14. PRC Sanctions on Iran
- 15. PRC Nuclear Energy
- 16. PRC Tibet Issue
- 17. Cross-Strait Relations
Archives
Policy Forum 10-029: The Chinese Road to Pyongyang
John Delury, Associate Director of the Asia Society’s Center on U.S.-China Relations and director of the North Korea Inside Out Task Force, writes, “The final misconception is that Hu might have demanded an explanation from Kim as to the causes of the fatal sinking of a South Korean vessel in late March. Hu… may have discussed the issue with Kim, as well as the intense pressure Lee is under to respond, if not retaliate. But the Chinese do not assume that North Korea is guilty. Even in the face of strong evidence of North Korean wrongdoing, the Chinese are inclined to view the incident in the context of inter-Korean relations, and do not want to let it determine the fate of the Six Party Talks.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 19 May, 2010
- 1. Sinking of ROK Naval Vessel
- 2. US on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
- 3. OSCE on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
- 4. Japan on DPRK Nuclear Talks
- 5. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 6. ROK on Sino-DPRK Relations
- 7. Inter-Korean Economic Relations
- 8. Inter-Korean Maritime Border
- 9. Inter-Korean Relations
- 10. UN-DPRK Relations
- 11. ROK Environment
- 12. Russo-ROK Energy Cooperation
- 13. USFJ Base Relocation
- 14. Cross Strait Relations
- 15. Sino-Russian Relations
- 16. PRC Tibet Issue
- 17. PRC Government
- 18. PRC Earthquake Reconstruction
- 19. PRC Environment
NAPSNet Daily Report 18 May, 2010
- 1. US on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
- 2. DPRK on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
- 3. Inter-Korean Relations
- 4. DPRK Internal Situation
- 5. DPRK Economy
- 6. DPRK Environment
- 7. Tumen Area Environment
- 8. US-ROK Trade Relations
- 9. SDF Public Health Deployment
- 10. Japan Politics
- 11. Japanese Constitutional Revision
- 12. Japan Space Program
- 13. Sino-Japanese Relations
- 14. Sino-Indian Territorial Dispute
- 15. US and Cross Strait Relations
- 16. Cross-Strait Relations
Policy Forum 10-028: Nuclear Posture Review and Its Implications on the Korean Peninsula
Hyun-Wook Kim, Professor at the Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security (IFANS) in South Korea, writes, “It is important for both the U.S. and South Korea to develop a concrete plan for extended deterrence… Tailored extended deterrence should be established separately for Korea and Japan, covering not only nuclear elements but also diverse military, economic, political and legal elements that would produce more comprehensive extended deterrence measures.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 17 May, 2010
- 1. Sinking of ROK Naval Vessel
- 2. ROK Response to Naval Ship Sinking
- 3. Japan, PRC on Sinking of ROK Naval Vessel
- 4. Sino-DPRK Relations
- 5. Inter-Korean Naval Clashes
- 6. Inter-Korea Economic Cooperation
- 7. Inter-Korea Relations
- 8. DPRK Special Forces
- 9. DPRK Arms Shipments
- 10. DPRK Leadership
- 11. DPRK Nuclear Energy
- 12. DPRK-Zimbabwe Relations
- 13. US-ROK Military Alliance
- 14. ROK Military Procurements
- 15. ROK Civil Rights
- 16. USFJ Base Relocation
- 17. Japanese Whaling
- 18. Japanese Textbook Controversy
- 19. Japanese Foreign Relations
- 20. Japan on PRC Nuclear Program
- 21. Hong Kong Government
- 22. PRC Renewable Energy
- 23. PRC Energy Security
NAPSNet Daily Report 14 May, 2010
- 1. DPRK-US Relations
- 2. PRC on DPRK Nuclear Program
- 3. Sino-DPRK Relations
- 4. US on Sino-DPRK Relations
- 5. DPRK Communications
- 6. Inter-Korean Economic Relations
- 7. Japan Abductee Issue
- 8. US-ROK Relations
- 9. ROK Defense Strategy
- 10. ROK-Japanese Territorial Dispute
- 11. ROK-Japan Relations
- 12. ROK Export Controls
- 13. USFJ Base Relocation
- 14. Japanese Politics
- 15. Sino-US Relations
- 16. Sino-Russian Military Relations
- 17. Sino-Russian Energy Cooperation
- 18. US and Cross Strait Relations
- 19. PRC African Investment
- 20. PRC Nuclear Energy Technology Exports
- 21. PRC Civil Society
- 22. PRC Internet Control
NAPSNet Daily Report 13 May, 2010
- 1. DPRK Nuclear Program
- 2. PRC on Six Party Talks
- 3. Six-Party Talks
- 4. DPRK Public Health
- 5. ROK Naval Ship Sinking
- 6. US on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
- 7. ROK-UAE Military Cooperation
- 8. ROK-US Military Cooperation
- 9. ROK-Japan Territorial Dispute
- 10. ROK-Japan Historical Disputes
- 11. Japan on Nuclear Disarmament
- 12. USFJ Base Relocation
- 13. US on USFJ Base Relocation
- 14. Japanese Politics
- 15. Sino-Japan Relations
- 16. Sino-US Relations
- 17. PRC Nuclear Posture
- 18. Sino-India Climate Cooperation
Policy Forum 10-027: North Korea: Changing but Stable
Alexander Mansourov, Nautilus Institute Senior Associate, writes, “North Korea is changing. The latest demonstration of the government’s desire to facilitate change is the new package of economic adjustment measures. Those measures seek to displace imports, restore self-reliance, and consolidate state control over the economic system at the expense of the newly emerging proto-markets in retail trade and the small private merchant class that may create political headaches for the regime down the road.”
NAPSNet Daily Report 12 May, 2010
- I. NAPSNet
- DPRK Arms Trade
- Sino-DPRK Economic Relations
- DPRK Food Security
- Inter-Korea Relations
- Inter-Korean Economic Relations
- DPRK Nuclear Energy
- US on ROK Naval Ship Sinking
- ROK-US Military Cooperation
- ROK Politics
- USFJ Base Relocation
- Sino-Japan Relations
- Sino-US Relations
- Sino-Pakistan Nuclear Cooperation
- Sino-India Relations
- PRC Human Rights
- PRC Tibet Issue
- Cross-Strait Relations