Decebmer 25, 2004 The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists published an article called, “South Korea’s Nuclear Surprise” written by Nautilus Executive Director Peter Hayes, with Jungmin Kang, Richard Tanter, Li Bin, and Tatsujiro Suzuki. The article states, “the sequence of events suggests that the Additional Protocol’s new inspection provisions work. The effectiveness of environmental sampling […]
Archives
Korea Backgrounder: How the South Views its Brother from Another Planet
The International Crisis Group, an independent, non-profit, multinational organization, working through field-based analysis and high-level advocacy to prevent and resolve deadly conflict, writes: it is not true, as alarmists on the right sometimes claim that South Korea is being taken down the path of socialism. Today’s young people have a dual mindset about North Korea: they are more accepting of dialogue with the regime but do not embrace the system. However, as moderates are being drowned out by the more vocal extremes, these subtle distinctions are being lost.
Ending the North Korean Nuclear Crisis by the Task Force on U.S. Korea Policy
The Task Force on U.S. Korea Policy, co-sponsored by the Center for International Policy and the Center for East Asian Studies of the University of Chicago, writes: Given greater trust the United States would find it easier than in earlier years to negotiate an agreement with North Korea that would end its development of long-range missiles capable of delivering nuclear, chemical or biological weapons to U.S. territory. Similarly, Japan and South Korea would find it easier to negotiate agreements with Pyongyang that would head off the escalating competitive development of short-range and medium-range missiles.
North Korea: Where Next for the Nuclear Talks? by the International Crisis Group
The International Crisis Group, an independent, non-profit, multinational organization, working through field-based analysis and high-level advocacy to prevent and resolve deadly conflict, wrote: Talks with North Korea are never easy. There is some skepticism that Pyongyang will never accept a deal, however objectively reasonable. The only way to find out once and for all is to offer it one that at least all five other parties see as such. And that will require more being put on the table than has been the case so far.
Power Grid Interconnection for a Nuclear Free Korean Peninsula
Jungmin Kang, an independent nuclear policy analyst in Seoul and Associate of the Nautilus Institute, writes: Via the implementation of the ROK-DPRK-RFE power grid interconnection, the energy support to the DPRK could get the DPRK involved in the multilateral energy cooperation system, reduce political tension around the Korean peninsula, and thereby bring a positive effect in resolving the DPRK nuclear conundrum.
The South Korean Laser Isotope Separation Experience
CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Essay by Mark Gorwitz III. Notes by Mark Gorwitz I. Introduction Mark Gorwitz, Special Contributor to the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) Online, writes: “Taken as a whole, the open literature shows the extent of South Korean research in the area of laser isotope separation. Technology learned in […]
South Korea’s Nuclear Mis-Adventures
The following is a paper by Jungmin Kang, Tatsujiro Suzuki, Peter Hayes. Jungmin Kang is an independent nuclear policy analyst in Seoul and Associate of Nautilus Institute; Tatsujiro Suzuki is a nuclear analyst affiliated with University of Tokyo in Tokyo; Peter Hayes is Director of Nautilus Institute in San Francisco.
Will the South’s Uranium Enrichment Test Affect the North Korean Nuclear Issue?
The following is a paper by Cheong Wook-Sik, representative of the Civil Network for a Peaceful Korea. Cheong Wook-Sik writes, “in a situation in which finding a solution to the North Korean nuclear issue has been difficult enough, it seems clear that with the appearance of the South Korean uranium enrichment issue, the six-party talks have run into yet another potential problem. There is room, however, to turn this misfortune into a blessing.”
Unlikely Partners in the Quest for Juche: Humanitarian Aid Agencies in North Korea by Edward P. Reed
This special report by Edward P. Reed, the Associate Director of the Center for East Asian Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, was presented at the 2004 Workshop: “Towards a Peaceful Resolution with North Korea: Crafting a New International Engagement Framework in Washington D.C. The workshop, which ran from February 12-13, 2004, was hosted by the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP) and the Korea Economic Institute (KEI), in cooperation with the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Reed argues that, “aid agencies must negotiate interventions that are development-oriented, while at same time employing an operational style that builds the institutional and personal trust on which acceptable levels of accountability are based.”
This article may be found at:
http://www.kiep.go.kr/project/workshop.nsf/0/9CA26C701C3FCCCE49256E3F002262C4/$file/Reed.pdf/Reed.pdf
Excerpt from “Dealing With North Korea’s Nuclear Programs
This statement by Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs James A. Kelly was made to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee on July 15th. The statement summarized publicly for the first time the seven-page U.S. proposal presented to North Korea at the most recent Beijing negotiations.