In today’s Report:
2. US Food Aid to DPRK
3. ROK Defenses Against DPRK Threats
4. Russia Plans Arms for ROK Debt Payment
5. ROK Spy in US Sentenced
6. Cambodian Coup
2. DPRK Glorification of Kim Il-sung
3. ROK-Japan Territorial Waters Dispute
2. Japan-Russia Relations
3. Review of Japan-US Defense Cooperation Guidelines
4. Japan’s Food Aid Policy Toward DPRK
5. Assessment of Hwang’s Statement
6. Japan-ROK Territorial Waters Dispute
7. Japanese Prime Minister on NATO Expansion
I. United States
1. Hwang Statements, US Reactions
US State Department Spokesman Nicholas Burns (“STATE DEPT. NOON BRIEFING, JULY 11, 1997,” USIA Transcript, 7/11/97) was asked, in the context of recent statements by DPRK defector Hwang Jang-yop, whether there is “any possible attack or strategy that the North Koreans could use that would succeed in keeping the US from defending the South?” Burns replied, “We will defend South Korea and Japan, and no one is going to blackmail us. We are the greatest power in the Pacific. Little North Korea — North Korea, a failing communist regime, is not going to blackmail the United States on the question of our defensive commitments, our alliance commitments to Japan and South Korea, which have been in place for going on five decades now.” Asked if the US believes Hwang’s statements regarding the DPRK threat to the extent that many in the ROK appear to, Burns replied, “Mr. Hwang is a free man now, and thank goodness for that. He is free to say what he wishes. We have debriefed him. We have interviewed him over the course of several days, and I am not at liberty to tell you our conclusions from that, except to say that he is free to say what he wishes.”
US Defense Department Spokesman Mike Doubleday (“PENTAGON SPOKESMAN’S REGULAR,” USIA Transcript, 7/11/97), asked if the US believes Hwang’s statements regarding the DPRK threat to the extent that many in the ROK appear to, replied, “Well, I think you’re aware that the United States has had some direct access to Mr. Hwang, and we’ve also been debriefed by the government of the Republic of Korea on their discussions with him. I’m not going to get into any characterization of anything that we