Negotiating with North Koreans: The U.S. Experience at Panmunjom
Author/Editor: Reed R. Probst
Publisher/Sponsor: US Army War College
Report Date: May 16, 1977
Document Number: –
Nautilus Filing Number: 748
Box Number: 25
This study report by Reed Probst examines the negotiation strategy between the US and the DPRK in regards to discussions over two major events between the two countries: the Axe Murder incident in the DMZ in 1976 [more information on this incident is available at here] and the negotiations over the USS Pueblo, captured by the DPRK in 1968.
Mr. Probst writes:
“The record shows that the North Koreans have been quick to go to the conference table with the US when one or more of the following conditions have obtained:
- when the North Korean position or recent gains are physically threatened.
- when the North Koreans believe that negotiations might help them to consolidate past gains or to facilitate future gains.
- when the North Koreans wish to avoid an escalation of tension or a direct military confrontation.” [page 12]
“For all their slander and belittling of the ‘US imperialist aggressors’ in their propaganda, the North Koreans respect power and will back down only when confronted with a superior military force.” [page 14]
This study report reveals underlying assumptions based on past experience that inform American negotiations with North Korea today. For contrasting perspectives, readers may wish to review items posted at the Negotiating Style section of the Nautilus Institute DPRK Briefing Book.
This report was released to the Nautilus Institute under the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).